Understanding Users' Privacy Reasoning and Behaviors During Chatbot Use to Support Meaningful Agency in Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational agents (CAs) (e.g., chatbots) are increasingly used in settings where users disclose sensitive information, raising significant privacy concerns. Because privacy judgments are highly contextual, supporting users to engage in privacy-protective actions during chatbot interactions is essential. However, enabling meaningful engagement requires a deeper understanding of how users currently reason about and manage sensitive information during realistic chatbot use scenarios. To investigate this, we qualitatively examined computer science (undergraduate and masters) students' in-the-moment disclosure and protection behaviors, as well as the reasoning underlying these behaviors, across a range of realistic chatbot tasks. Participants used a simulated ChatGPT interface with and without a privacy notice panel that intercepts message submissions, highlights potentially sensitive information, and offers privacy protective actions. The panel supports anonymization through retracting, faking, and generalizing, and surfaces two of ChatGPT's built-in privacy controls to improve their discoverability. Drawing on interaction logs, think-alouds, and survey responses, we analyzed how the panel fostered privacy awareness, encouraged protective actions, and supported context-specific reasoning about what information to protect and how. We further discuss design opportunities for tools that provide users greater and more meaningful agency in protecting sensitive information during CA interactions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.
Builds on
15 of 50 references.
References · 15
- 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 437
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 195
- 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 175
- 2024The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistantscited by 107
- 2024A Review on Edge Large Language Models: Design, Execution, and Applicationscited by 100
- 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agentscited by 94
- 2023The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AIcited by 87
- 2023"It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agentscited by 60
- 2024Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 47
- 2022Differentially Private Decoding in Large Language Modelscited by 34
- 2024CLEAR: Towards Contextual LLM-Empowered Privacy Policy Analysis and Risk Generation for Large Language Model Applicationscited by 33
3 more
- 2023Deepfakes, Phrenology, Surveillance, and More! A Taxonomy of AI Privacy Riskscited by 31
- 2024Adanonymizer: Interactively Navigating and Balancing the Duality of Privacy and Output Performance in Human-LLM Interactioncited by 6
- 2023FedBot: Enhancing Privacy in Chatbots with Federated Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.