mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Risk-based test framework for LLM features in regulated software

arXiv 2601.17292 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2026cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are increasingly embedded in regulated and safety-critical software, including clinical research platforms and healthcare information systems. While these features enable natural language search, summarization, and configuration assistance, they introduce risks such as hallucinations, harmful or out-of-scope advice, privacy and security issues, bias, instability under change, and adversarial misuse. Prior work on machine learning testing and AI assurance offers useful concepts but limited guidance for interactive, product-embedded assistants. This paper proposes a risk-based testing framework for LLM features in regulated software: a six-category risk taxonomy, a layered test strategy mapping risks to concrete tests across guardrail, orchestration, and system layers, and a case study applying the approach to a Knowledgebase assistant in a clinical research platform.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Measuring What Matters: A Framework for Evaluating Safety Risks in Real-World LLM Applications
  2. 2025Challenges in Testing Large Language Model Based Software: A Faceted Taxonomy
  3. 2025ASTRAL: Automated Safety Testing of Large Language Models
  4. 2025Rethinking Testing for LLM Applications: Characteristics, Challenges, and a Lightweight Interaction Protocol
  5. 2024Current state of LLM Risks and AI Guardrails
  6. 2024AEGIS: Online Adaptive AI Content Safety Moderation with Ensemble of LLM Experts
  7. 2026Taxonomy-Driven Analysis of Open-Source AI Risk Mitigation Tools
  8. 2025Early External Safety Testing of OpenAI's o3-mini: Insights from the Pre-Deployment Evaluation