How Does Personalized Memory Shape LLM Behavior? Benchmarking Rational Preference Utilization in Personalized Assistants
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM)-powered assistants have recently integrated memory mechanisms that record user preferences, leading to more personalized and user-aligned responses. However, irrelevant personalized memories are often introduced into the context, interfering with the LLM's intent understanding. To comprehensively investigate the dual effects of personalization, we develop RPEval, a benchmark comprising a personalized intent reasoning dataset and a multi-granularity evaluation protocol. RPEval reveals the widespread phenomenon of irrational personalization in existing LLMs and, through error pattern analysis, illustrates its negative impact on user experience. Finally, we introduce RP-Reasoner, which treats memory utilization as a pragmatic reasoning process, enabling the selective integration of personalized information. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms carefully designed baselines on RPEval, and resolves 80% of the bad cases observed in a large-scale commercial personalized assistant, highlighting the potential of pragmatic reasoning to mitigate irrational personalization. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/XueyangFeng/RPEval.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 37 references.
References · 18
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
- 2024Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agentscited by 830
- 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 707
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 634
- 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
- 2025MemAgent: Reshaping Long-Context LLM with Multi-Conv RL-based Memory Agentcited by 246
- 2025Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMscited by 148
- 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 120
- 2023MemoChat: Tuning LLMs to Use Memos for Consistent Long-Range Open-Domain Conversationcited by 97
- 2024Crafting Personalized Agents through Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Editable Memory Graphscited by 38
6 more
- 2024Personalized LLM Response Generation with Parameterized Memory Injectioncited by 33
- 2025From 1,000,000 Users to Every User: Scaling Up Personalized Preference for User-level Alignmentcited by 30
- 2025PersonaBench: Evaluating AI Models on Understanding Personal Information through Accessing (Synthetic) Private User Datacited by 27
- 2024MemSim: A Bayesian Simulator for Evaluating Memory of LLM-based Personal Assistantscited by 24
- 2025Toward Multi-Session Personalized Conversation: A Large-Scale Dataset and Hierarchical Tree Framework for Implicit Reasoningcited by 21
- 2024AI-native Memory: A Pathway from LLMs Towards AGIcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026PERMA: Benchmarking Personalized Memory Agents via Event-Driven Preference and Realistic Task Environmentscited by 14
- 2026MemCalib: Benchmarking and Optimizing Memory Use in LLM Agentscited by 1
- 2026Personalization Meets Safety:Mechanisms,Risks,and Mitigations in Personalized LLMscited by 0
- 2026PersonaMem-v3: Toward Omni-Platform Personal Intelligence for Holistic User Understanding, Recommendation, and Agentic Taskscited by 0
- 2026Evaluating the Hidden Costs of Personalization in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026PRAGMA: Evaluating Personalized Guidance with Memory Alignment in Lifelong Conversationscited by 0
- 2026Over-Personalization Is a Decision Failure: Generation-Induced Apply Bias in LLMscited by 0
- 2026PairPref: When Should Memory Guide the Answer? A Benchmark for Contextual Preference Usecited by 0
- 2026PersEvalBench: Can LLM Evaluators Judge Contextually Appropriate Use of Persona Information?cited by 0
- 2026PersEvalBench: Can LLM Evaluators Judge Contextually Appropriate Use of Persona Information?13 Oct 2026
- 2026PairPref: When Should Memory Guide the Answer? A Benchmark for Contextual Preference Use28 Sep 2026
- 2026Over-Personalization Is a Decision Failure: Generation-Induced Apply Bias in LLMs28 Sep 2026
- 2026MemCalib: Benchmarking and Optimizing Memory Use in LLM Agents21 Sep 2026
- 2026PRAGMA: Evaluating Personalized Guidance with Memory Alignment in Lifelong Conversations9 Sep 2026
- 2026Evaluating the Hidden Costs of Personalization in Large Language Models28 Aug 2026
- 2026PersonaMem-v3: Toward Omni-Platform Personal Intelligence for Holistic User Understanding, Recommendation, and Agentic Tasks16 Jul 2026
- 2026Personalization Meets Safety:Mechanisms,Risks,and Mitigations in Personalized LLMs8 Jun 2026
- 2026PERMA: Benchmarking Personalized Memory Agents via Event-Driven Preference and Realistic Task Environments24 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards Natural Personalization: Evaluating Long-Horizon Preference Following in Personalized User-LLM Interactions
- 2024Exploring Safety-Utility Trade-Offs in Personalized Language Models
- 2026BenchPreS: A Benchmark for Context-Aware Personalized Preference Selectivity of Persistent-Memory LLMs
- 2026Personalize-then-Store: Benchmarking and Learning Personalized Memory for Long-horizon Agents
- 2025RPM: Reasoning-Level Personalization for Black-Box Large Language Models
- 2026AMemGym: Interactive Memory Benchmarking for Assistants in Long-Horizon Conversations
- 2026Hypotheses-Guided Self Distillation for Continual Personalization
- 2024PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences