Jacobian Scopes: token-level causal attributions in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) make next-token predictions based on clues present in their context, such as semantic descriptions and in-context examples. Yet, elucidating which prior tokens most strongly influence a given prediction remains challenging due to the proliferation of layers and attention heads in modern architectures. We propose Jacobian Scopes, a suite of gradient-based, token-level causal attribution methods for interpreting LLM predictions. Grounded in perturbation theory and information geometry, Jacobian Scopes quantify how input tokens influence various aspects of a model's prediction, such as specific logits, the full predictive distribution, and model uncertainty (effective temperature). Through case studies spanning instruction understanding, translation, and in-context learning (ICL), we demonstrate how Jacobian Scopes reveal implicit political biases, uncover word- and phrase-level translation strategies, and shed light on recently debated mechanisms underlying in-context time-series forecasting. To facilitate exploration of Jacobian Scopes on custom text, we open-source our implementations and provide a cloud-hosted interactive demo at https://huggingface.co/spaces/Typony/JacobianScopes.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.
Builds on
36 of 55 references.
References · 36
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
24 more
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 960
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 930
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2022Transformers learn in-context by gradient descentcited by 714
- 2022What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classescited by 700
- 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 593
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
- 2023Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasterscited by 491
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
- 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matterscited by 221
- 2023A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations of LLMs by Validating Low-Confidence Generationcited by 202
- 2023Large Language Models as General Pattern Machinescited by 196
- 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 196
- 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 191
- 2023The mechanistic basis of data dependence and abrupt learning in an in-context classification taskcited by 115
- 2024Measuring Political Bias in Large Language Models: What Is Said and How It Is Saidcited by 89
- 2024Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 77
- 2021Discretized Integrated Gradients for Explaining Language Modelscited by 45
- 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
- 2024LLMs learn governing principles of dynamical systems, revealing an in-context neural scaling lawcited by 32
- 2021Pulling back information geometrycited by 23
- 2024Density estimation with LLMs: a geometric investigation of in-context learning trajectoriescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026A Structural Theory of Position Bias in Transformerscited by 3
- 2026The Attribution Contract for Generative Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026GIF: Locally Sound Geometric Information Flow Control for LLMscited by 0
- 2026How Token Influence Decays with Distance: A Green-Function View of Trained Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026How Token Influence Decays with Distance: A Green-Function View of Trained Language Models28 Jun 2026
- 2026GIF: Locally Sound Geometric Information Flow Control for LLMs22 Jun 2026
- 2026The Attribution Contract for Generative Language Models21 May 2026
- 2026A Structural Theory of Position Bias in Transformers18 Feb 2026