mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data-driven Lake Water Quality Forecasting for Time Series with Missing Data using Machine Learning

arXiv 2601.15503 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Volunteer-led lake monitoring yields irregular, seasonal time series with many gaps arising from ice cover, weather-related access constraints, and occasional human errors, complicating forecasting and early warning of harmful algal blooms. We study Secchi Disk Depth (SDD) forecasting on a 30-lake, data-rich subset drawn from three decades of in-situ records collected across Maine lakes. Missingness is handled via Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE), and we evaluate performance with a normalized Mean Absolute Error (nMAE) metric for cross-lake comparability. Among six candidates, ridge regression provides the best mean test performance. Using ridge regression, we then quantify the minimal sample size, showing that under a backward, recent-history protocol, the model reaches within 5% of full-history accuracy with approximately 176 training samples per lake on average. We also identify a minimal feature set, where a compact four-feature subset matches the thirteen-feature baseline within the same 5% tolerance. Bringing these results together, we introduce a joint feasibility function that identifies the minimal training history and fewest predictors sufficient to achieve the target of staying within 5% of the complete-history, full-feature baseline. In our study, meeting the 5% accuracy target required about 64 recent samples and just one predictor per lake, highlighting the practicality of targeted monitoring. Hence, our joint feasibility strategy unifies recent-history length and feature choice under a fixed accuracy target, yielding a simple, efficient rule for setting sampling effort and measurement priorities for lake researchers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

Builds on

11 of 67 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 548
  2. 2018GAIN: Missing Data Imputation using Generative Adversarial Netscited by 349
  3. 2020Missing Data Imputation using Optimal Transportcited by 99
  4. 2021Darts: User-Friendly Modern Machine Learning for Time Seriescited by 90
  5. 2021MIRACLE: Causally-Aware Imputation via Learning Missing Data Mechanismscited by 50
  6. 2023ProbTS: Benchmarking Point and Distributional Forecasting across Diverse Prediction Horizonscited by 35
  7. 2022Review of automated time series forecasting pipelinescited by 17
  8. 2022Long-Term Missing Value Imputation for Time Series Data Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
  9. 2021Recommending Training Set Sizes for Classificationcited by 2
  10. 2023Sample size determination via learning-type curvescited by 2
  11. 2022Imputation of Missing Streamflow Data at Multiple Gauging Stations in Benin Republiccited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.