BREPS: Bounding-Box Robustness Evaluation of Promptable Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Promptable segmentation models such as SAM have established a powerful paradigm, enabling strong generalization to unseen objects and domains with minimal user input, including points, bounding boxes, and text prompts. Among these, bounding boxes stand out as particularly effective, often outperforming points while significantly reducing annotation costs. However, current training and evaluation protocols typically rely on synthetic prompts generated through simple heuristics, offering limited insight into real-world robustness. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of promptable segmentation models to natural variations in bounding box prompts. First, we conduct a controlled user study and collect thousands of real bounding box annotations. Our analysis reveals substantial variability in segmentation quality across users for the same model and instance, indicating that SAM-like models are highly sensitive to natural prompt noise. Then, since exhaustive testing of all possible user inputs is computationally prohibitive, we reformulate robustness evaluation as a white-box optimization problem over the bounding box prompt space. We introduce BREPS, a method for generating adversarial bounding boxes that minimize or maximize segmentation error while adhering to naturalness constraints. Finally, we benchmark state-of-the-art models across 10 datasets, spanning everyday scenes to medical imaging. Code - https://github.com/emb-ai/BREPS.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.
Builds on
22 of 49 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
- 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 957
- 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 929
- 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 459
- 2023Faster Segment Anything: Towards Lightweight SAM for Mobile Applicationscited by 352
- 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
- 2021Reviving Iterative Training with Mask Guidance for Interactive Segmentationcited by 163
- 2022SimpleClick: Interactive Image Segmentation with Simple Vision Transformerscited by 111
10 more
- 2023ScribblePrompt: Fast and Flexible Interactive Segmentation for Any Biomedical Imagecited by 48
- 2023MobileSAMv2: Faster Segment Anything to Everythingcited by 42
- 2024RobustSAM: Segment Anything Robustly on Degraded Imagescited by 36
- 2024DarkSAM: Fooling Segment Anything Model to Segment Nothingcited by 32
- 2023An Empirical Study on the Robustness of the Segment Anything Model (SAM)cited by 23
- 2024ASAM: Boosting Segment Anything Model with Adversarial Tuningcited by 12
- 2023Segment (Almost) Nothing: Prompt-Agnostic Adversarial Attacks on Segmentation Modelscited by 5
- 2024RClicks: Realistic Click Simulation for Benchmarking Interactive Segmentationcited by 4
- 2023Interactive Segmentation for Diverse Gesture Types Without Contextcited by 3
- 2024TETRIS: Towards Exploring the Robustness of Interactive Segmentationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.