Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Writing effective rebuttals is a high-stakes task that demands more than linguistic fluency, as it requires precise alignment between reviewer intent and manuscript details. Current solutions typically treat this as a direct-to-text generation problem, suffering from hallucination, overlooked critiques, and a lack of verifiable grounding. To address these limitations, we introduce RebuttalAgent, the first multi-agents framework that reframes rebuttal generation as an evidence-centric planning task. Our system decomposes complex feedback into atomic concerns and dynamically constructs hybrid contexts by synthesizing compressed summaries with high-fidelity text while integrating an autonomous and on-demand external search module to resolve concerns requiring outside literature. By generating an inspectable response plan before drafting, RebuttalAgent ensures that every argument is explicitly anchored in internal or external evidence. We validate our approach on the proposed RebuttalBench and demonstrate that our pipeline outperforms strong baselines in coverage, faithfulness, and strategic coherence, offering a transparent and controllable assistant for the peer review process.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.
Builds on
28 of 54 references.
References · 28
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 634
- 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 422
16 more
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Paperscited by 104
- 2025PaSa: An LLM Agent for Comprehensive Academic Paper Searchcited by 64
- 2024Nova: An Iterative Planning and Search Approach to Enhance Novelty and Diversity of LLM Generated Ideascited by 57
- 2024VBench++: Comprehensive and Versatile Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 45
- 2024ResearchTown: Simulator of Human Research Communitycited by 37
- 2021DISAPERE: A Dataset for Discourse Structure in Peer Review Discussionscited by 36
- 2025Curie: Toward Rigorous and Automated Scientific Experimentation with AI Agentscited by 33
- 2019Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conferencecited by 31
- 2024Automated Data Visualization from Natural Language via Large Language Models: An Exploratory Studycited by 27
- 2025Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussionscited by 23
- 2024Literature Meets Data: A Synergistic Approach to Hypothesis Generationcited by 20
- 2023Exploring Jiu-Jitsu Argumentation for Writing Peer Review Rebuttalscited by 18
- 2024Efficient Diffusion as Low Light Enhancercited by 13
- 2025RAPO++: Cross-Stage Prompt Optimization for Text-to-Video Generation via Data Alignment and Test-Time Scalingcited by 10
- 2025LED-Merging: Mitigating Safety-Utility Conflicts in Model Merging with Location-Election-Disjointcited by 7
- 2025Human-Agent Collaborative Paper-to-Page Craftingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guidecited by 11
- 2026Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Futurecited by 6
- 2026AutoChecklist: Composable Pipelines for Checklist Generation and Scoring with LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 5
- 2026Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlookcited by 5
- 2026What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Reviewcited by 2
- 2026Advancing MLLM-based UAV Image Understanding and Reasoning: A Benchmark and a Training-Free Multi-Agent Systemcited by 1
- 2026The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishingcited by 1
- 2026PatRe: A Full-Stage Office Action and Rebuttal Generation Benchmark for Patent Examinationcited by 0
- 2026ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generationcited by 0
- 2026ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generation8 Sep 2026
- 2026The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishing7 Sep 2026
- 2026Advancing MLLM-based UAV Image Understanding and Reasoning: A Benchmark and a Training-Free Multi-Agent System12 Aug 2026
- 2026AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide18 May 2026
- 2026PatRe: A Full-Stage Office Action and Rebuttal Generation Benchmark for Patent Examination5 May 2026
- 2026Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future30 Apr 2026
- 2026What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review21 Apr 2026
- 2026Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlook26 Mar 2026
- 2026AutoChecklist: Composable Pipelines for Checklist Generation and Scoring with LLM-as-a-Judge7 Mar 2026