mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Explain: Supervised Token Attribution from Transformer Attention Patterns

arXiv 2601.14112 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable AI (XAI) has become critical as transformer-based models are deployed in high-stakes applications including healthcare, legal systems, and financial services, where opacity hinders trust and accountability. Transformers self-attention mechanisms have proven valuable for model interpretability, with attention weights successfully used to understand model focus and behavior (Xu et al., 2015); (Wiegreffe and Pinter, 2019). However, existing attention-based explanation methods rely on manually defined aggregation strategies and fixed attribution rules (Abnar and Zuidema, 2020a); (Chefer et al., 2021), while model-agnostic approaches (LIME, SHAP) treat the model as a black box and incur significant computational costs through input perturbation. We introduce Explanation Network (ExpNet), a lightweight neural network that learns an explicit mapping from transformer attention patterns to token-level importance scores. Unlike prior methods, ExpNet discovers optimal attention feature combinations automatically rather than relying on predetermined rules. We evaluate ExpNet in a challenging cross-task setting and benchmark it against a broad spectrum of model-agnostic methods and attention-based techniques spanning four methodological families.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

Builds on

28 of 34 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  9. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  10. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  11. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  12. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
16 more
  1. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  2. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
  3. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  4. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  5. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  6. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  7. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  8. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  9. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  10. 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 316
  11. 2019A Multiscale Visualization of Attention in the Transformer Modelcited by 292
  12. 2018Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficultcited by 140
  13. 2019On Identifiability in Transformerscited by 115
  14. 2022Grad-SAM: Explaining Transformers via Gradient Self-Attention Mapscited by 42
  15. 2022ferret: a Framework for Benchmarking Explainers on Transformerscited by 26
  16. 2024Better Explain Transformers by Illuminating Important Informationcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.