mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intermittent time series forecasting: local vs global models

arXiv 2601.14031 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Forecasting intermittent time series, which contain zeros, is a crucial challenge in supply chains as inventory policies require probabilistic forecasts to establish safety levels. Intermittent time series are commonly forecast using local models, trained individually on each time series. In the last years global models, trained on a large collection of time series, have become popular for time series forecasting. Global models are often based on neural networks or gradient boosted trees. We carry out the first study comparing state-of-the-art probabilistic local and global models on intermittent time series. For global models we consider three different distribution heads suitable for intermittent time series: negative binomial, hurdle-shifted negative binomial and Tweedie. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first use of the latter two with neural networks. We perform experiments on five datasets comprising overall more than 40'000 real-world time series. Among global models, TiDE, a simple neural network architecture, achieves the best accuracy; it also consistently outperforms local models and has lower computational requirements. Large global models are instead much more computationally demanding and less accurate. Among the distribution heads, the Tweedie provides the best estimates of the highest quantiles.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 52 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,141
  5. 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
  6. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,004
  7. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
  8. 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 226
  9. 2019Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Current Status and Future Directionscited by 172
  10. 2025TabArena: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Datacited by 152
  11. 2020Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Tutorial and Literature Surveycited by 117
  12. 2020Principles and Algorithms for Forecasting Groups of Time Series: Locality and Globalitycited by 70
8 more
  1. 2022Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practicescited by 54
  2. 2022Criteria for Classifying Forecasting Methodscited by 48
  3. 2020Global Models for Time Series Forecasting: A Simulation Studycited by 21
  4. 2019Sales Demand Forecast in E-commerce using a Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network Methodologycited by 18
  5. 2021M5 Competition Uncertainty: Overdispersion, distributional forecasting, GAMLSS and beyondcited by 11
  6. 2021Wielding Occam's razor: Fast and frugal retail forecastingcited by 4
  7. 2023Scalable Probabilistic Forecasting in Retail with Gradient Boosted Trees: A Practitioner's Approachcited by 4
  8. 2025Forecasting intermittent time series with Gaussian Processes and Tweedie likelihoodcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.