mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PINA: Prompt Injection Attack against Navigation Agents

arXiv 2601.13612 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2026cs.CRcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Navigation agents powered by large language models (LLMs) convert natural language instructions into executable plans and actions. Compared to text-based applications, their security is far more critical: a successful prompt injection attack does not just alter outputs but can directly misguide physical navigation, leading to unsafe routes, mission failure, or real-world harm. Despite this high-stakes setting, the vulnerability of navigation agents to prompt injection remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose PINA, an adaptive prompt optimization framework tailored to navigation agents under black-box, long-context, and action-executable constraints. Experiments on indoor and outdoor navigation agents show that PINA achieves high attack success rates with an average ASR of 87.5%, surpasses all baselines, and remains robust under ablation and adaptive-attack conditions. This work provides the first systematic investigation of prompt injection attacks in navigation and highlights their urgent security implications for embodied LLM agents.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks22 Apr
  2. 2024BadRobot: Jailbreaking Embodied LLM Agents in the Physical World16 Jul

Other references · 11

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  3. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  4. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 568
  5. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 328
  6. 2023ChatGPT for Robotics: Design Principles and Model Abilitiescited by 296
  7. 2023NavGPT: Explicit Reasoning in Vision-and-Language Navigation with Large Language Modelscited by 274
  8. 2023Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 237
  9. 2023Towards Learning a Generalist Model for Embodied Navigationcited by 135
  10. 2025UAVs Meet LLMs: Overviews and Perspectives Toward Agentic Low-Altitude Mobilitycited by 48
  11. 2023TypeFly: Flying Drones with Large Language Modelcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025BadNAVer: Exploring Jailbreak Attacks On Vision-and-Language Navigation
  2. 2024How Secure Are Large Language Models (LLMs) for Navigation in Urban Environments?
  3. 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysis
  4. 2026Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks
  5. 2026When Prompts Control Robots: Prompt Injection Attacks in Multi-Agent Robotic Systems
  6. 2024The Task Shield: Enforcing Task Alignment to Defend Against Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents
  7. 2025Design Patterns for Securing LLM Agents against Prompt Injections
  8. 2026Assessing Automated Prompt Injection Attacks in Agentic Environments