TREX: Tokenizer Regression for Optimal Data Mixture
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Building effective tokenizers for multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) requires careful control over language-specific data mixtures. While a tokenizer's compression performance critically affects the efficiency of LLM training and inference, existing approaches rely on heuristics or costly large-scale searches to determine optimal language ratios. We introduce Tokenizer Regression for Optimal Data MiXture (TREX), a regression-based framework that efficiently predicts the optimal data mixture for tokenizer training. TREX trains small-scale proxy tokenizers on random mixtures, gathers their compression statistics, and learns to predict compression performance from data mixtures. This learned model enables scalable mixture search before large-scale tokenizer training, mitigating the accuracy-cost trade-off in multilingual tokenizer design. Tokenizers trained with TReX's predicted mixtures outperform mixtures based on LLaMA3 and uniform distributions by up to 12% in both inand out-of-distribution compression efficiency, demonstrating strong scalability, robustness, and practical effectiveness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 39 references.
References · 24
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
- 2023Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Modelscited by 186
- 2024Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluationcited by 181
- 2024Data Mixing Laws: Optimizing Data Mixtures by Predicting Language Modeling Performancecited by 179
- 2024RegMix: Data Mixture as Regression for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 172
- 2023Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?cited by 105
- 2023DoGE: Domain Reweighting with Generalization Estimationcited by 87
- 2024Unpacking Tokenization: Evaluating Text Compression and its Correlation with Model Performancecited by 61
- 2025SuperBPE: Space Travel for Language Modelscited by 58
12 more
- 2025Falcon-H1: A Family of Hybrid-Head Language Models Redefining Efficiency and Performancecited by 52
- 2021Multi-view Subword Regularizationcited by 40
- 2025Enhancing Multilingual LLM Pretraining with Model-Based Data Selectioncited by 33
- 2022How Robust is Neural Machine Translation to Language Imbalance in Multilingual Tokenizer Training?cited by 20
- 2025Causal Estimation of Tokenisation Biascited by 16
- 2025How Much is Enough? The Diminishing Returns of Tokenization Training Datacited by 15
- 2025One Tokenizer To Rule Them All: Emergent Language Plasticity via Multilingual Tokenizerscited by 11
- 2023Training and Evaluation of a Multilingual Tokenizer for GPT-SW3cited by 7
- 2025How does a Language-Specific Tokenizer affect LLMs?cited by 6
- 2025PARAM-1 BharatGen 2.9B Modelcited by 5
- 2025The Art of Breaking Words: Rethinking Multilingual Tokenizer Designcited by 4
- 2025KORMo: Korean Open Reasoning Model for Everyonecited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.