mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bi-Attention HateXplain : Taking into account the sequential aspect of data during explainability in a multi-task context

arXiv 2601.13018 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Technological advances in the Internet and online social networks have brought many benefits to humanity. At the same time, this growth has led to an increase in hate speech, the main global threat. To improve the reliability of black-box models used for hate speech detection, post-hoc approaches such as LIME, SHAP, and LRP provide the explanation after training the classification model. In contrast, multi-task approaches based on the HateXplain benchmark learn to explain and classify simultaneously. However, results from HateXplain-based algorithms show that predicted attention varies considerably when it should be constant. This attention variability can lead to inconsistent interpretations, instability of predictions, and learning difficulties. To solve this problem, we propose the BiAtt-BiRNN-HateXplain (Bidirectional Attention BiRNN HateXplain) model which is easier to explain compared to LLMs which are more complex in view of the need for transparency, and will take into account the sequential aspect of the input data during explainability thanks to a BiRNN layer. Thus, if the explanation is correctly estimated, thanks to multi-task learning (explainability and classification task), the model could classify better and commit fewer unintentional bias errors related to communities. The experimental results on HateXplain data show a clear improvement in detection performance, explainability and a reduction in unintentional bias.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.

Builds on

8 of 21 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  4. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  5. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  6. 2016Attention-Based Recurrent Neural Network Models for Joint Intent Detection and Slot Fillingcited by 137
  7. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 115
  8. 2020Simplifying the explanation of deep neural networks with sufficient and necessary feature-sets: case of text classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.