Latent Space Inference via Paired Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work describes a novel data-driven latent space inference framework built on paired autoencoders to handle observational inconsistencies when solving inverse problems. Our approach uses two autoencoders, one for the parameter space and one for the observation space, connected by learned mappings between the autoencoders' latent spaces. These mappings enable a surrogate for regularized inversion and optimization in low-dimensional, informative latent spaces. Our flexible framework can work with partial, noisy, or out-of-distribution data, all while maintaining consistency with the underlying physical models. The paired autoencoders enable reconstruction of corrupted data, and then use the reconstructed data for parameter estimation, which produces more accurate reconstructions compared to paired autoencoders alone and end-to-end encoder-decoders of the same architecture, especially in scenarios with data inconsistencies. We demonstrate our approaches on two imaging examples in medical tomography and geophysical seismic-waveform inversion, but the described approaches are broadly applicable to a variety of inverse problems in scientific and engineering applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2026.
Builds on
23 of 67 references.
References · 23
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2022Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problemscited by 1,375
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 337
- 2020Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 290
- 2023A Variational Perspective on Solving Inverse Problems with Diffusion Modelscited by 217
- 2018Adversarial Regularizers in Inverse Problemscited by 102
- 2019Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset biascited by 93
- 2024PnP-Flow: Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Flow Matchingcited by 92
- 2018Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Priorcited by 73
- 2023Training-free Linear Image Inverses via Flowscited by 70
- 2025InverseBench: Benchmarking Plug-and-Play Diffusion Priors for Inverse Problems in Physical Sciencescited by 67
11 more
- 2018Stochastic seismic waveform inversion using generative adversarial networks as a geological priorcited by 47
- 2023Learning Weakly Convex Regularizers for Convergent Image-Reconstruction Algorithmscited by 30
- 2022PatchNR: Learning from Very Few Images by Patch Normalizing Flow Regularizationcited by 22
- 2021Learning Regularization Parameters of Inverse Problems via Deep Neural Networkscited by 19
- 20232DeteCT -- A large 2D expandable, trainable, experimental Computed Tomography dataset for machine learningcited by 9
- 2023Learning from small data sets: Patch-based regularizers in inverse problems for image reconstructioncited by 9
- 2024Paired Autoencoders for Likelihood-free Estimation in Inverse Problemscited by 6
- 2025A Paired Autoencoder Framework for Inverse Problems via Bayes Risk Minimizationcited by 6
- 2025Good Things Come in Pairs: Paired Autoencoders for Inverse Problemscited by 5
- 2025Latent Twinscited by 3
- 2024Deep Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation Problemscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.