Queueing-Aware Optimization of Reasoning Tokens for Accuracy-Latency Trade-offs in LLM Servers
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a single large language model (LLM) server that serves a heterogeneous stream of queries belonging to N distinct task types. Queries arrive according to a Poisson process, and each type occurs with a known prior probability. For each task type, the server allocates a fixed number of internal thinking tokens, which determines the computational effort devoted to that query. The token allocation induces an accuracy-latency trade-off: the service time follows an approximately affine function of the allocated tokens, while the probability of a correct response exhibits diminishing returns. Under a first-in, first-out (FIFO) service discipline, the system operates as an M/G/1 queue, and the mean system time depends on the first and second moments of the resulting service-time distribution. We formulate a constrained optimization problem that maximizes a weighted average accuracy objective penalized by the mean system time, subject to architectural token-budget constraints and queue-stability conditions. The objective function is shown to be strictly concave over the stability region, which ensures existence and uniqueness of the optimal token allocation. The first-order optimality conditions yield a coupled projected fixed-point characterization of the optimum, together with an iterative solution and an explicit sufficient condition for contraction. Moreover, a projected gradient method with a computable global step-size bound is developed to guarantee convergence beyond the contractive regime. Finally, integer-valued token allocations are attained via rounding of the continuous solution, and the resulting performance loss is evaluated in simulation results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 24 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
Other references · 17
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
- 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
- 2022Efficiently Scaling Transformer Inferencecited by 539
- 2022Confident Adaptive Language Modelingcited by 310
5 more
- 2024CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Executioncited by 300
- 2023Deja Vu: Contextual Sparsity for Efficient LLMs at Inference Timecited by 252
- 2023Response Length Perception and Sequence Scheduling: An LLM-Empowered LLM Inference Pipelinecited by 86
- 2023AlpaServe: Statistical Multiplexing with Model Parallelism for Deep Learning Servingcited by 31
- 2024A Queueing Theoretic Perspective on Low-Latency LLM Inference with Variable Token Lengthcited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Multi-Layer Scheduling for MoE-Based LLM Reasoning
- 2025Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute
- 2025Throughput-Optimal Scheduling Algorithms for LLM Inference and AI Agents
- 2026PASCAL: A Phase-Aware Scheduling Algorithm for Serving Reasoning-based Large Language Models
- 2026Flow-Controlled Scheduling for LLM Inference with Provable Stability Guarantees
- 2025Intra-request branch orchestration for efficient LLM reasoning
- 2026Position: LLM Serving Needs Mathematical Optimization and Algorithmic Foundations, Not Just Heuristics
- 2024Intelligent Router for LLM Workloads: Improving Performance Through Workload-Aware Load Balancing