mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

R-LAM: Reproducibility-Constrained Large Action Models for Scientific Workflow Automation

arXiv 2601.09749 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Action Models (LAMs) extend large language models by enabling autonomous decision-making and tool execution, making them promising for automating scientific workflows. However, scientific workflows impose strict requirements on reproducibility, auditability, and deterministic execution, which are not satisfied by generic LLM-based agents. Unconstrained action generation can lead to silent state changes, non-deterministic executions, and irreproducible experimental results, limiting the applicability of LAMs in scientific settings. In this paper, we propose R-LAM, a reproducibility-constrained framework for applying Large Action Models to scientific workflow automation. R-LAM introduces structured action schemas, deterministic execution policies, and explicit provenance tracking to ensure that every action and intermediate artifact is auditable and replayable. The framework supports failure-aware execution loops and controlled workflow forking, enabling iterative experimentation without compromising reproducibility. We implement R-LAM as a lightweight Python framework and release it as an open-source PyPI package to facilitate reproducible research. An experimental evaluation of representative scientific workflows demonstrates that R-LAM improves reproducibility success rates and execution reliability compared to unconstrained LLM-based agents, while retaining adaptive control over workflow execution.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.

Builds on

9 of 21 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  2. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Taskscited by 306
  3. 2025MedAgentBench: A Realistic Virtual EHR Environment to Benchmark Medical LLM Agentscited by 56
  4. 2024Large Action Models: From Inception to Implementationcited by 18
  5. 2024AlabOS: A Python-based Reconfigurable Workflow Management Framework for Autonomous Laboratoriescited by 10
  6. 2025The (R)evolution of Scientific Workflows in the Agentic AI Era: Towards Autonomous Sciencecited by 7
  7. 2024WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflowscited by 6
  8. 2025Snakemaker: Seamlessly transforming ad-hoc analyses into sustainable Snakemake workflows with generative AIcited by 3
  9. 2025Architecting Large Action Models for Human-in-the-Loop Intelligent Robotscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026FlowScout: From Execution Feedback to Reliable Tool-Using Agent Workflows
  2. 2026AutoResearch: An Execution-Grounded Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable Research Workflow Automation
  3. 2026Talk Freely, Execute Strictly: Schema-Gated Agentic AI for Flexible and Reproducible Scientific Workflows
  4. 2026ToolRosella: Translating Code Repositories into Standardized Tools for Scientific Agents
  5. 2026Complete Cyclic Subtask Graphs for Tool-Using LLM Agents: Flexibility, Cost, and Bottlenecks in Long-Horizon Workflows
  6. 2026Mimosa Framework: Toward Evolving Multi-Agent Systems for Scientific Research
  7. 2026Natural-Language Workflows Are Not Software Yet: Artifact-Driven Compilation for Reliable Agent Execution
  8. 2026Deploy-Master: Automating the Deployment of 50,000+ Agent-Ready Scientific Tools in One Day