mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aggregating Diverse Cue Experts for AI-Generated Image Detection

arXiv 2601.08790 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2026cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid emergence of image synthesis models poses challenges to the generalization of AI-generated image detectors. However, existing methods often rely on model-specific features, leading to overfitting and poor generalization. In this paper, we introduce the Multi-Cue Aggregation Network (MCAN), a novel framework that integrates different yet complementary cues in a unified network. MCAN employs a mixture-of-encoders adapter to dynamically process these cues, enabling more adaptive and robust feature representation. Our cues include the input image itself, which represents the overall content, and high-frequency components that emphasize edge details. Additionally, we introduce a Chromatic Inconsistency (CI) cue, which normalizes intensity values and captures noise information introduced during the image acquisition process in real images, making these noise patterns more distinguishable from those in AI-generated content. Unlike prior methods, MCAN's novelty lies in its unified multi-cue aggregation framework, which integrates spatial, frequency-domain, and chromaticity-based information for enhanced representation learning. These cues are intrinsically more indicative of real images, enhancing cross-model generalization. Extensive experiments on the GenImage, Chameleon, and UniversalFakeDetect benchmark validate the state-of-the-art performance of MCAN. In the GenImage dataset, MCAN outperforms the best state-of-the-art method by up to 7.4% in average ACC across eight different image generators.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  5. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
  6. 2021Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 740
  7. 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 518
  8. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
  9. 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
  10. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
  11. 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 386
  12. 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
13 more
  1. 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
  2. 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
  3. 2024A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 187
  4. 2023Forgery-aware Adaptive Transformer for Generalizable Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 180
  5. 2023Raising the Bar of AI-generated Image Detection with CLIPcited by 163
  6. 2022On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 156
  7. 2018Learning Rich Features for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 154
  8. 2024AEROBLADE: Training-Free Detection of Latent Diffusion Images Using Autoencoder Reconstruction Errorcited by 123
  9. 2023Mixture of Cluster-conditional LoRA Experts for Vision-language Instruction Tuningcited by 106
  10. 2022Sparse Mixture-of-Experts are Domain Generalizable Learnerscited by 85
  11. 2023Shadows Don't Lie and Lines Can't Bend! Generative Models don't know Projective Geometry...for nowcited by 61
  12. 2024LaRE2: Latent Reconstruction Error Based Method for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 47
  13. 2023Pixel-Inconsistency Modeling for Image Manipulation Localizationcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.