How Order-Sensitive Are LLMs? OrderProbe for Deterministic Structural Reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) excel at semantic understanding, yet their ability to reconstruct internal structure from scrambled inputs remains underexplored. Sentence-level restoration is difficult to evaluate automatically because scrambled sentences often admit multiple valid reorderings. We introduce OrderProbe, a deterministic benchmark for structural reconstruction using fixed four-character expressions in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean, which have a unique canonical order and thus support exact-match scoring. We further propose a diagnostic framework that evaluates models beyond recovery accuracy, including Semantic Accuracy, Logical Validity, Structural Consistency, Robustness, and Information Density. Experiments on twelve widely used LLMs show that structural reconstruction remains difficult even for frontier systems: zero-shot recovery frequently falls below 35%. We also observe a consistent gap between meaning-oriented generation and exact structural reconstruction, suggesting that structural robustness is not an automatic byproduct of semantic competence.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.
9 papers.
- 2026What Should I Cite? A RAG Benchmark for Academic Citation Predictioncited by 4
- 2026Rubric-Guided Process Reward for Stepwise Model Routingcited by 2
- 2026MultiPress: A Multi-Agent Framework for Interpretable Multimodal News Classificationcited by 1
- 2026Self-Evaluation Is Already There: Eliciting Latent Judge Calibration in Base LLMs with Minimal Datacited by 1
- 2026PreUnlearn: Auditing Collateral Knowledge Damage Before Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 1
- 2026Modality Fault Lines: Structural Corruptions Reveal Fragile Omni-Modal Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026JPO: Juris Policy Optimization for Structured Legal Reasoning in Criminal Judgment Predictioncited by 0
- 2026PhoenixNest-Video: Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Agent Framework for Automated Video Interview Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026SAVOR: Self-Aware Visual Grounding via Confidence-Calibrated Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Hallucination Mitigationcited by 0
- 2026SAVOR: Self-Aware Visual Grounding via Confidence-Calibrated Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Hallucination Mitigation15 Sep 2026
- 2026PhoenixNest-Video: Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Agent Framework for Automated Video Interview Assessment2 Sep 2026
- 2026JPO: Juris Policy Optimization for Structured Legal Reasoning in Criminal Judgment Prediction30 Aug 2026
- 2026Modality Fault Lines: Structural Corruptions Reveal Fragile Omni-Modal Reasoning29 Aug 2026
- 2026PreUnlearn: Auditing Collateral Knowledge Damage Before Large Language Model Unlearning16 Jun 2026
- 2026Self-Evaluation Is Already There: Eliciting Latent Judge Calibration in Base LLMs with Minimal Data3 Jun 2026
- 2026Rubric-Guided Process Reward for Stepwise Model Routing28 May 2026
- 2026MultiPress: A Multi-Agent Framework for Interpretable Multimodal News Classification4 Apr 2026
- 2026What Should I Cite? A RAG Benchmark for Academic Citation Prediction21 Jan 2026