SCALPEL: Selective Capability Ablation via Low-rank Parameter Editing for Large Language Model Interpretability Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models excel across diverse domains, yet their deployment in healthcare, legal systems, and autonomous decision-making remains limited by incomplete understanding of their internal mechanisms. As these models integrate into high-stakes systems, understanding how they encode capabilities has become fundamental to interpretability research. Traditional approaches identify important modules through gradient attribution or activation analysis, assuming specific capabilities map to specific components. However, this oversimplifies neural computation: modules may contribute to multiple capabilities simultaneously, while single capabilities may distribute across multiple modules. These coarse-grained analyses fail to capture fine-grained, distributed capability encoding. We present SCALPEL (Selective Capability Ablation via Low-rank Parameter Editing for Large language models), a framework representing capabilities as low-rank parameter subspaces rather than discrete modules. Our key insight is that capabilities can be characterized by low-rank modifications distributed across layers and modules, enabling precise capability removal without affecting others. By training LoRA adapters to reduce distinguishing correct from incorrect answers while preserving general language modeling quality, SCALPEL identifies low-rank representations responsible for particular capabilities while remaining disentangled from others. Experiments across diverse capability and linguistic tasks from BLiMP demonstrate that SCALPEL successfully removes target capabilities while preserving general capabilities, providing fine-grained insights into capability distribution across parameter space. Results reveal that capabilities exhibit low-rank structure and can be selectively ablated through targeted parameter-space interventions, offering nuanced understanding of capability encoding in LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.
Builds on
36 of 48 references.
References · 36
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
24 more
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 601
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 341
- 2023LanguageMPC: Large Language Models as Decision Makers for Autonomous Drivingcited by 190
- 2024AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to componentscited by 111
- 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 77
- 2023Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis, Inference and Explanationcited by 39
- 2023A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.