Distributional Clarity: The Hidden Driver of RL-Friendliness in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language model families exhibit striking disparity in their capacity to benefit from reinforcement learning: under identical training, models like Qwen achieve substantial gains, while others like Llama yield limited improvements. Complementing data-centric approaches, we reveal that this disparity reflects a hidden structural property: distributional clarity in probability space. Through a three-stage analysis-from phenomenon to mechanism to interpretation-we uncover that RL-friendly models exhibit intra-class compactness and inter-class separation in their probability assignments to correct vs. incorrect responses. We quantify this clarity using the Silhouette Coefficient (S) and demonstrate that (1) high S correlates strongly with RL performance; (2) low S is associated with severe logic errors and reasoning instability. To confirm this property, we introduce a Silhouette-Aware Reweighting strategy that prioritizes low-S samples during training. Experiments across six mathematical benchmarks show consistent improvements across all model families, with gains up to 5.9 points on AIME24. Our work establishes distributional clarity as a fundamental, trainable property underlying RL-Friendliness.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.
Builds on
22 of 35 references.
References · 22
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 450
- 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 373
- 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 277
- 2025MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attentioncited by 248
- 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 199
- 2025Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certaintycited by 182
10 more
- 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scalingcited by 110
- 2025SEED-GRPO: Semantic Entropy Enhanced GRPO for Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimizationcited by 87
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifierscited by 83
- 2024OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AIcited by 70
- 2025Unlocking Exploration in RLVR: Uncertainty-aware Advantage Shaping for Deeper Reasoningcited by 34
- 2025Front-Loading Reasoning: The Synergy between Pretraining and Post-Training Datacited by 26
- 2025A Survey on LLM Mid-Trainingcited by 18
- 2025Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Qualitycited by 14
- 2025Midtraining Bridges Pretraining and Posttraining Distributionscited by 10
- 2024Demystifying Language Model Forgetting with Low-rank Example Associationscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.