mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distributional Clarity: The Hidden Driver of RL-Friendliness in Large Language Models

arXiv 2601.06911 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language model families exhibit striking disparity in their capacity to benefit from reinforcement learning: under identical training, models like Qwen achieve substantial gains, while others like Llama yield limited improvements. Complementing data-centric approaches, we reveal that this disparity reflects a hidden structural property: distributional clarity in probability space. Through a three-stage analysis-from phenomenon to mechanism to interpretation-we uncover that RL-friendly models exhibit intra-class compactness and inter-class separation in their probability assignments to correct vs. incorrect responses. We quantify this clarity using the Silhouette Coefficient (S) and demonstrate that (1) high S correlates strongly with RL performance; (2) low S is associated with severe logic errors and reasoning instability. To confirm this property, we introduce a Silhouette-Aware Reweighting strategy that prioritizes low-S samples during training. Experiments across six mathematical benchmarks show consistent improvements across all model families, with gains up to 5.9 points on AIME24. Our work establishes distributional clarity as a fundamental, trainable property underlying RL-Friendliness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  2. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  3. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  4. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  5. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  6. 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
  7. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 450
  8. 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 373
  9. 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 277
  10. 2025MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attentioncited by 248
  11. 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 199
  12. 2025Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certaintycited by 182
10 more
  1. 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scalingcited by 110
  2. 2025SEED-GRPO: Semantic Entropy Enhanced GRPO for Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimizationcited by 87
  3. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifierscited by 83
  4. 2024OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AIcited by 70
  5. 2025Unlocking Exploration in RLVR: Uncertainty-aware Advantage Shaping for Deeper Reasoningcited by 34
  6. 2025Front-Loading Reasoning: The Synergy between Pretraining and Post-Training Datacited by 26
  7. 2025A Survey on LLM Mid-Trainingcited by 18
  8. 2025Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Qualitycited by 14
  9. 2025Midtraining Bridges Pretraining and Posttraining Distributionscited by 10
  10. 2024Demystifying Language Model Forgetting with Low-rank Example Associationscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.