mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning QoE from Packet-Level Measurements in Encrypted Video Conferencing Traffic

arXiv 2601.06862 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2026cs.CR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quality of the user experience has become one of the most important aspects in todays world, as it directly influences individuals willingness to continue using or abandon a product or service. In this context, video conferencing applications (VCAs), which experienced widespread adoption following the COVID-19 pandemic, must deliver excellent performance to remain competitive in an increasingly crowded market. Although content providers (CPs) such as Zoom, WhatsApp, Telegram, and Google Meet can assess conversation quality by comparing transmitted and received data. The widespread use of end-to-end encryption in VCAs makes quality-of-experience (QoE) evaluation by internet service providers (ISPs) far more challenging. Since ISPs do not have access to the encrypted content, they must rely on passive measurements of unencrypted traffic characteristics on the data path. In this work, we present a simple yet effective QoE prediction framework based on an almost stock convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture that uses only the packet sizes extracted from the communication between two participants in a video conferencing (VC) call to predict two QoE metrics: BRISQUE and MOS. The proposed framework is simple, easy to implement, and does not require high-end computational resources, yet it provides superior prediction performance, as shown in our experiments on two custom datasets collected from WhatsApp and Zoom, which achieve substantial improvements over previous models for the QoE prediction task.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 47 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  4. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
  5. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  6. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  7. 2017Deep Packet: A Novel Approach For Encrypted Traffic Classification Using Deep Learningcited by 70
  8. 2018Deep Learning for Encrypted Traffic Classification: An Overviewcited by 27
  9. 2018How to Achieve High Classification Accuracy with Just a Few Labels: A Semi-supervised Approach Using Sampled Packetscited by 19
  10. 2017Why (and How) Networks Should Run Themselvescited by 13
  11. 2018Streaming Video QoE Modeling and Prediction: A Long Short-Term Memory Approachcited by 5
  12. 2020Convolutional Neural Networks for Continuous QoE Prediction in Video Streaming Servicescited by 4
1 more
  1. 2022Revisiting Information Cascades in Online Social Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.