mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Stage Evolutionary Model Merging with Meta Data Driven Curriculum Learning for Sentiment-Specialized Large Language Modeling

arXiv 2601.06780 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has significantly transformed natural language processing (NLP), enabling more generalized models to perform various tasks with minimal training. However, traditional sentiment analysis methods, which focus on individual tasks such as sentiment classification or aspect-based analysis, are not practical for real-world applications that usually require handling multiple tasks. While offering flexibility, LLMs in sentiment-specific tasks often fall short of the required accuracy. Techniques like fine-tuning and evolutionary model merging help integrate models into a unified framework, which can improve the learning performance while reducing computational costs. The use of task meta-data and curriculum learning to optimize learning processes remains underexplored, while sentiment analysis is a critical task in NLP that requires high accuracy and scalability across multiple subtasks. In this study, we propose a hybrid learning model called Multi-stage Evolutionary Model Merging with Meta data driven Curriculum Learning (MEM-MCL), to enhance the sentiment analysis in large language modeling. In particular, expert models are created through instruction tuning for specific sentiment tasks and then merged using evolutionary algorithms to form a unified model. The merging process is optimized with weak data to enhance performance across tasks. The curriculum learning is incorporated to provide a learning sequence based on task difficulty, improving knowledge extraction from LLMs. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed MEM-MCL model outperforms conventional LLMs in a majority of sentiment analysis tasks, achieving superior results across various subtasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 34 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  5. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  6. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  7. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 486
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
  9. 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 387
  10. 2023Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Checkcited by 268
  11. 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 224
  12. 2024Evolutionary Optimization of Model Merging Recipescited by 208
8 more
  1. 2022Branch-Train-Merge: Embarrassingly Parallel Training of Expert Language Modelscited by 191
  2. 2023Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERTcited by 155
  3. 2021Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction as Paraphrase Generationcited by 100
  4. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Studycited by 96
  5. 2023Instruct-FinGPT: Financial Sentiment Analysis by Instruction Tuning of General-Purpose Large Language Modelscited by 58
  6. 2023LM-Cocktail: Resilient Tuning of Language Models via Model Mergingcited by 44
  7. 2020A SentiWordNet Strategy for Curriculum Learning in Sentiment Analysiscited by 4
  8. 2019Curriculum Learning Strategies for Hindi-English Codemixed Sentiment Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.