mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SAPL: Semantic-Agnostic Prompt Learning in CLIP for Weakly Supervised Image Manipulation Localization

arXiv 2601.06222 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Malicious image manipulation threatens public safety and requires efficient localization methods. Existing approaches depend on costly pixel-level annotations which make training expensive. Existing weakly supervised methods rely only on image-level binary labels and focus on global classification, often overlooking local edge cues that are critical for precise localization. We observe that feature variations at manipulated boundaries are substantially larger than in interior regions. To address this gap, we propose Semantic-Agnostic Prompt Learning (SAPL) in CLIP, which learns text prompts that intentionally encode non-semantic, boundary-centric cues so that CLIPs multimodal similarity highlights manipulation edges rather than high-level object semantics. SAPL combines two complementary modules Edge-aware Contextual Prompt Learning (ECPL) and Hierarchical Edge Contrastive Learning (HECL) to exploit edge information in both textual and visual spaces. The proposed ECPL leverages edge-enhanced image features to generate learnable textual prompts via an attention mechanism, embedding semantic-irrelevant information into text features, to guide CLIP focusing on manipulation edges. The proposed HECL extract genuine and manipulated edge patches, and utilize contrastive learning to boost the discrimination between genuine edge patches and manipulated edge patches. Finally, we predict the manipulated regions from the similarity map after processing. Extensive experiments on multiple public benchmarks demonstrate that SAPL significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving state-of-the-art localization performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2026.

Builds on

19 of 44 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
  3. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  4. 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 532
  5. 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
  6. 2021MVSS-Net: Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervised Networks for Image Manipulation Detectioncited by 117
  7. 2021Image Manipulation Detection by Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervisioncited by 111
  8. 2022ObjectFormer for Image Manipulation Detection and Localizationcited by 78
  9. 2023IML-ViT: Benchmarking Image Manipulation Localization by Vision Transformercited by 44
  10. 2014Fully Convolutional Multi-Class Multiple Instance Learningcited by 37
  11. 2018Generate, Segment and Refine: Towards Generic Manipulation Segmentationcited by 33
  12. 2023Pixel-Inconsistency Modeling for Image Manipulation Localizationcited by 33
7 more
  1. 2019Constrained R-CNN: A general image manipulation detection modelcited by 29
  2. 2024Can We Get Rid of Handcrafted Feature Extractors? SparseViT: Nonsemantics-Centered, Parameter-Efficient Image Manipulation Localization through Spare-Coding Transformercited by 29
  3. 2023Towards Generic Image Manipulation Detection with Weakly-Supervised Self-Consistency Learningcited by 23
  4. 2020GSR-Net: Graph Super-Resolution Network for Predicting High-Resolution from Low-Resolution Functional Brain Connectomescited by 10
  5. 2025Reinforced Multi-teacher Knowledge Distillation for Efficient General Image Forgery Detection and Localizationcited by 4
  6. 2024PROMPT-IML: Image Manipulation Localization with Pre-trained Foundation Models Through Prompt Tuningcited by 3
  7. 2025Context-Aware Weakly Supervised Image Manipulation Localization with SAM Refinementcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.