mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can large language models interpret unstructured chat data on dynamic group decision-making processes? Evidence on joint destination choice

arXiv 2601.05582 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social activities result from complex joint activity-travel decisions between group members. While observing the decision-making process of these activities is difficult via traditional travel surveys, the advent of new types of data, such as unstructured chat data, can help shed some light on these complex processes. However, interpreting these decision-making processes requires inferring both explicit and implicit factors. This typically involves the labor-intensive task of manually annotating dialogues to capture context-dependent meanings shaped by the social and cultural norms. This study evaluates the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate and complement human annotation in interpreting decision-making processes from group chats, using data on joint eating-out activities in Japan as a case study. We designed a prompting framework inspired by the knowledge acquisition process, which sequentially extracts key decision-making factors, including the group-level restaurant choice set and outcome, individual preferences of each alternative, and the specific attributes driving those preferences. This structured process guides the LLM to interpret group chat data, converting unstructured dialogues into structured tabular data describing decision-making factors. To evaluate LLM-driven outputs, we conduct a quantitative analysis using a human-annotated ground truth dataset and a qualitative error analysis to examine model limitations. Results show that while the LLM reliably captures explicit decision-making factors, it struggles to identify nuanced implicit factors that human annotators readily identified. We pinpoint specific contexts when LLM-based extraction can be trusted versus when human oversight remains essential. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of LLM-based analysis for incorporating non-traditional data sources on social activities.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 54 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  5. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
  6. 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 621
  7. 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 558
  8. 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 282
  9. 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 152
  10. 2023Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 149
  11. 2025Context Length Alone Hurts LLM Performance Despite Perfect Retrievalcited by 127
  12. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Automatic Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 63
10 more
  1. 2024PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs' Pragmatics Capabilitiescited by 59
  2. 2023Getting MoRE out of Mixture of Language Model Reasoning Expertscited by 44
  3. 2024Planning Like Human: A Dual-process Framework for Dialogue Planningcited by 32
  4. 2025Pragmatics in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey on Datasets, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challengescited by 31
  5. 2025On The Origin of Cultural Biases in Language Models: From Pre-training Data to Linguistic Phenomenacited by 22
  6. 2024Toward LLM-Agent-Based Modeling of Transportation Systems: A Conceptual Frameworkcited by 19
  7. 2025Leveraging Dual Process Theory in Language Agent Framework for Real-time Simultaneous Human-AI Collaborationcited by 10
  8. 2023Harnessing ChatGPT for thematic analysis: Are we ready?cited by 8
  9. 2023Modeling joint eating-out destination choices incorporating group-level impedance: A case study of the Greater Tokyo Areacited by 1
  10. 2023Text-aided Group Decision-making Process Observation Method (x-GDP): A novel methodology for observing the joint decision-making process of travel choicescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.