mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Minary Primitive of Computational Autopoiesis

arXiv 2601.04501 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2026math.DS cs.LG math.PRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Minary, a computational framework designed as a candidate for the first formally provable autopoietic primitive. Minary represents interacting probabilistic events as multi-dimensional vectors and combines them via linear superposition rather than multiplicative scalar operations, thereby preserving uncertainty and enabling constructive and destructive interference in the range [-1,1]. A fixed set of ``perspectives'' evaluates ``semantic dimensions'' according to hidden competencies, and their interactions drive two discrete-time stochastic processes. We model this system as an iterated random affine map and use the theory of iterated random functions to prove that it converges in distribution to a unique stationary law; we moreover obtain an explicit closed form for the limiting expectation in terms of row, column, and global averages of the competency matrix. We then derive exact formulas for the mean and variance of the normalized consensus conditioned on the activation of a given semantic dimension, revealing how consensus depends on competency structure rather than raw input signals. Finally, we argue that Minary is organizationally closed yet operationally open in the sense of Maturana and Varela, and we discuss implications for building self-maintaining, distributed, and parallelizable computational systems that house a uniquely subjective notion of identity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.

Builds on

0 of 31 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Stochastic CHAOS: Why Deterministic Inference Kills, and Distributional Variability Is the Heartbeat of Artifical Cognition
  2. 2026Locally Coherent, Globally Incoherent: Bounding Compositional Incoherence in Multi-Component LLM Agents
  3. 2026Cognitive Cells: A Compositional Framework for Populations of Small Language Models
  4. 2026Towards Physical Intuitions for Alignment Dynamics: A Case Study With Randomness Crystallization
  5. 2026Bayesian updates from coalgebraic determinisation ↗
  6. 2026Epistemic-Probabilistic Model for Guarded Multi-Agent LLM Coordination
  7. 2026Iteris: Agentic Research Loops for Computational Mathematics
  8. 2026Certifying Collective Reasoning in Multi-Agent Systems via Koopman Spectral Analysis