mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Better, But Not Sufficient: Testing Video ANNs Against Macaque IT Dynamics

arXiv 2601.03392 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.CV cs.NEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feedforward artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained on static images remain the dominant models of the the primate ventral visual stream, yet they are intrinsically limited to static computations. The primate world is dynamic, and the macaque ventral visual pathways, specifically the inferior temporal (IT) cortex not only supports object recognition but also encodes object motion velocity during naturalistic video viewing. Does IT's temporal responses reflect nothing more than time-unfolded feedforward transformations, framewise features with shallow temporal pooling, or do they embody richer dynamic computations? We tested this by comparing macaque IT responses during naturalistic videos against static, recurrent, and video-based ANN models. Video models provided modest improvements in neural predictivity, particularly at later response stages, raising the question of what kind of dynamics they capture. To probe this, we applied a stress test: decoders trained on naturalistic videos were evaluated on "appearance-free" variants that preserve motion but remove shape and texture. IT population activity generalized across this manipulation, but all ANN classes failed. Thus, current video models better capture appearance-bound dynamics rather than the appearance-invariant temporal computations expressed in IT, underscoring the need for new objectives that encode biological temporal statistics and invariances.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

11 of 21 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  3. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
  4. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  5. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
  6. 2016Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Trackingcited by 566
  7. 2024VideoMamba: State Space Model for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 325
  8. 2019Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNscited by 90
  9. 2022Visual Object Tracking in First Person Visioncited by 25
  10. 2022Is Appearance Free Action Recognition Possible?cited by 16
  11. 2023The Quest for an Integrated Set of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Object Recognition in Primatescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.