mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse Knowledge Distillation: A Mathematical Framework for Probability-Domain Temperature Scaling and Multi-Stage Compression

arXiv 2601.03195 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 6

On the map: Knowledge distillation → General knowledge distillation methods

Abstract (arXiv)

We develop a unified theoretical framework for sparse knowledge distillation based on probability-domain softening operators. While the equivalence p1/T propto softmax(z/T) is well known, our contribution is an operator-level analytical framework built on this foundation rather than the equivalence itself. The framework comprises four core components: (i) operator-agnostic bias--variance decompositions that characterize when sparse students outperform dense teachers, (ii) a homotopy path formalization of multi-stage pruning in function space explaining why iterative compression succeeds where one-shot pruning fails, (iii) convergence guarantees establishing O(1/n) rates for n-stage distillation with explicit parameter dependence, and (iv) equivalence class characterizations identifying distinct probability-domain operators that yield identical student models under capacity constraints. We introduce an axiomatic definition of probability-domain softening operators based on ranking preservation, continuity, entropy monotonicity, identity, and boundary behavior, and show that multiple non-equivalent operator families satisfy these axioms. All learning-theoretic guarantees are shown to hold uniformly across this operator class, independent of implementation details. These results provide theoretical grounding for black-box teacher distillation, partial-access settings such as top-k truncation and text-only outputs, and privacy-preserving model compression.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General knowledge distillation methods, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  3. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  4. 2019On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillationcited by 381
  5. 2025A Unified Definition of Hallucination: It's The World Model, Stupid!cited by 6
  6. 2025Incentives or Ontology? A Structural Rebuttal to OpenAI's Hallucination Thesiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Sparse Logit Sampling: Accelerating Knowledge Distillation in LLMs
  2. 2026The Distributional View of Knowledge Distillation
  3. 2021Knowledge Distillation as Semiparametric Inference
  4. 2025Low-Complexity Inference in Continual Learning via Compressed Knowledge Transfer
  5. 2026Distill on a Diet: Efficient Knowledge Distillation via Learnable Data Pruning
  6. 2021Sparse Progressive Distillation: Resolving Overfitting under Pretrain-and-Finetune Paradigm
  7. 2026Consistently Informative Soft-Label Temperature for Knowledge Distillation
  8. 2025RMT-KD: Random Matrix Theoretic Causal Knowledge Distillation