On the Intrinsic Limits of Transformer Image Embeddings in Non-Solvable Spatial Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Transformers (ViTs) excel in semantic recognition but exhibit systematic failures in spatial reasoning tasks such as mental rotation. While often attributed to data scale, this work argues that the limitation arises from the intrinsic circuit complexity of the architecture. By formalizing spatial understanding as learning a Group Homomorphism Problem -- where latent embeddings preserve the algebraic structure of physical transformations acting on images -- we identify a fundamental computational bottleneck. Specifically, for non-solvable groups (e.g., SO(3)), maintaining such structure-preserving embeddings is lowerbounded by the Word Problem, which is mathsfNC1-complete. In contrast, constant-depth ViTs with polynomial precision are strictly bounded by the complexity class mathsfTC0. Under the standard conjecture mathsfTC0 subsetneq mathsfNC1, a complexity boundary emerges: constant-depth architectures lack the logical depth required to capture non-solvable spatial structures in a single forward pass. To empirically validate this theoretical gap, we propose the Latent Space Algebra (LSA) benchmark, which reveals a significant degradation in ViT representations as the compositional depth of non-solvable tasks increases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.
Builds on
0 of 38 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Geometry without Position? When Positional Embeddings Help and Hurt Spatial Reasoning
- 2024Tackling the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus with Vision Transformers: the Importance of 2D Representation, Positions, and Objects
- 2024Beyond the Doors of Perception: Vision Transformers Represent Relations Between Objects
- 2026Unfold The World: Factorize 4D Properties in Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning
- 2026The Spatial Blindspot of Vision-Language Models
- 2026Semantic Richness or Geometric Reasoning? The Fragility of VLM's Visual Invariance
- 2026Decodable Is Not Grounded: A Vision-Ablation Arbiter for VLM Spatial Reasoning
- 2026Thinking in Structures: Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Constraint-Governed Spaces