Causal Manifold Fairness: Enforcing Geometric Invariance in Representation Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness in machine learning is increasingly critical, yet standard approaches often treat data as static points in a high-dimensional space, ignoring the underlying generative structure. We posit that sensitive attributes (e.g., race, gender) do not merely shift data distributions but causally warp the geometry of the data manifold itself. To address this, we introduce Causal Manifold Fairness (CMF), a novel framework that bridges causal inference and geometric deep learning. CMF learns a latent representation where the local Riemannian geometry, defined by the metric tensor and curvature, remains invariant under counterfactual interventions on sensitive attributes. By enforcing constraints on the Jacobian and Hessian of the decoder, CMF ensures that the rules of the latent space (distances and shapes) are preserved across demographic groups. We validate CMF on synthetic Structural Causal Models (SCMs), demonstrating that it effectively disentangles sensitive geometric warping while preserving task utility, offering a rigorous quantification of the fairness-utility trade-off via geometric metrics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.
Builds on
10 of 16 references.
References · 10
- 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 179
- 2017Latent Space Oddity: on the Curvature of Deep Generative Modelscited by 169
- 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
- 2017Metrics for Deep Generative Modelscited by 53
Built on by
Not cited yet.