mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reducing Hallucinations in LLMs via Factuality-Aware Preference Learning

arXiv 2601.03027 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Preference alignment methods such as RLHF and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) improve instruction following, but they can also reinforce hallucinations when preference judgments reward fluency and confidence over factual correctness. We introduce F-DPO (Factuality-aware Direct Preference Optimization), a simple extension of DPO that uses only binary factuality labels. F-DPO (i) applies a label-flipping transformation that corrects misordered preference pairs so the chosen response is never less factual than the rejected one, and (ii) adds a factuality-aware margin that emphasizes pairs with clear correctness differences, while reducing to standard DPO when both responses share the same factuality. We construct factuality-aware preference data by augmenting DPO pairs with binary factuality indicators and synthetic hallucinated variants. Across seven open-weight LLMs (1B-14B), F-DPO consistently improves factuality and reduces hallucination rates relative to both base models and standard DPO. On Qwen3-8B, F-DPO reduces hallucination rates by 5x(from 0.424 to 0.084) while improving factuality scores by 50% (from 5.26 to 7.90). F-DPO also generalizes to out-of-distribution benchmarks: on TruthfulQA, Qwen2.5-14B achieves +17% MC1 accuracy (0.500 to 0.585) and +49% MC2 accuracy (0.357 to 0.531). F-DPO requires no auxiliary reward model, token-level annotations, or multi-stage training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  5. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  7. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  8. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  9. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
  10. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
  11. 2024Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluationcited by 79
  12. 2025SafeDPO: A Simple Approach to Direct Preference Optimization with Enhanced Safetycited by 37
3 more
  1. 2023On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 26
  2. 2025Mask-DPO: Generalizable Fine-grained Factuality Alignment of LLMscited by 22
  3. 2025VLDBench Evaluating Multimodal Disinformation with Regulatory Alignmentcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Beyond Hallucinations: Enhancing LVLMs through Hallucination-Aware Direct Preference Optimization
  2. 2026Aligning with Your Own Voice: Self-Corrected Preference Learning for Hallucination Mitigation in LVLMs
  3. 2025Mitigating Hallucination Through Theory-Consistent Symmetric Multimodal Preference Optimization
  4. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via DPO: On-Policy Data Hold the Key
  5. 2025Mitigating Visual Hallucinations via Semantic Curriculum Preference Optimization in MLLMs
  6. 2024Mitigating Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Model via Hallucination-targeted Direct Preference Optimization
  7. 2026DA-DPO: Cost-efficient Difficulty-aware Preference Optimization for Reducing MLLM Hallucinations
  8. 2026P2-DPO: Grounding Hallucination in Perceptual Processing via Calibration Direct Preference Optimization