mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Moments Matter:Stabilizing Policy Optimization using Return Distributions

arXiv 2601.01803 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents often learn policies that achieve the same episodic return yet behave very differently, due to a combination of environmental (random transitions, initial conditions, reward noise) and algorithmic (minibatch selection, exploration noise) factors. In continuous control tasks, even small parameter shifts can produce unstable gaits, complicating both algorithm comparison and real-world transfer. Previous work has shown that such instability arises when policy updates traverse noisy neighborhoods and that the spread of post-update return distribution R(θ), obtained by repeatedly sampling minibatches, updating θ, and measuring final returns, is a useful indicator of this noise. Although explicitly constraining the policy to maintain a narrow R(θ) can improve stability, directly estimating R(θ) is computationally expensive in high-dimensional settings. We propose an alternative that takes advantage of environmental stochasticity to mitigate update-induced variability. Specifically, we model state-action return distribution through a distributional critic and then bias the advantage function of PPO using higher-order moments (skewness and kurtosis) of this distribution. By penalizing extreme tail behaviors, our method discourages policies from entering parameter regimes prone to instability. We hypothesize that in environments where post-update critic values align poorly with post-update returns, standard PPO struggles to produce a narrow R(θ). In such cases, our moment-based correction narrows R(θ), improving stability by up to 75% in Walker2D, while preserving comparable evaluation returns.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2026.

Builds on

5 of 5 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  3. 2022Discovered Policy Optimisationcited by 103
  4. 2023Learning Risk-Aware Quadrupedal Locomotion using Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  5. 2023Policy Optimization in a Noisy Neighborhood: On Return Landscapes in Continuous Controlcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026On Training in Imagination
  2. 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices
  3. 2026Loss Smoothing for Stable Adaptation Under Distribution Shift
  4. 2026EasyPPO: Stabilizing the Critic Is Key
  5. 2026Expected Return Causes Outcome-Level Mode Collapse in Reinforcement Learning and How to Fix It with Inverse Probability Scaling
  6. 2025A Multi-Fidelity Control Variate Approach for Policy Gradient Estimation
  7. 2022Regularizing a Model-based Policy Stationary Distribution to Stabilize Offline Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Expressivity and Statistical Trade-offs in Diffusion Policy Learning