mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Segmentation and Processing of German Court Decisions from Open Legal Data

arXiv 2601.01449 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.IR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The availability of structured legal data is important for advancing Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques for the German legal system. One of the most widely used datasets, Open Legal Data, provides a large-scale collection of German court decisions. While the metadata in this raw dataset is consistently structured, the decision texts themselves are inconsistently formatted and often lack clearly marked sections. Reliable separation of these sections is important not only for rhetorical role classification but also for downstream tasks such as retrieval and citation analysis. In this work, we introduce a cleaned and sectioned dataset of 251,038 German court decisions derived from the official Open Legal Data dataset. We systematically separated three important sections in German court decisions, namely Tenor (operative part of the decision), Tatbestand (facts of the case), and Entscheidungsgr"unde (judicial reasoning), which are often inconsistently represented in the original dataset. To ensure the reliability of our extraction process, we used Cochran's formula with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error to draw a statistically representative random sample of 384 cases, and manually verified that all three sections were correctly identified. We also extracted the Rechtsmittelbelehrung (appeal notice) as a separate field, since it is a procedural instruction and not part of the decision itself. The resulting corpus is publicly available in the JSONL format, making it an accessible resource for further research on the German legal system.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2026.

Builds on

4 of 14 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Towards an Open Platform for Legal Informationcited by 18
  2. 2024HiCuLR: Hierarchical Curriculum Learning for Rhetorical Role Labeling of Legal Documentscited by 6
  3. 2024Challenges and Considerations in Annotating Legal Data: A Comprehensive Overviewcited by 2
  4. 2025MARRO: Multi-headed Attention for Rhetorical Role Labeling in Legal Documentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.