mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Concave Certificates: Geometric Framework for Distributionally Robust Risk and Complexity Analysis

arXiv 2601.01311 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2026math.OC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distributionally Robust (DR) optimization aims to certify worst-case risk within a Wasserstein uncertainty set. Current certifications typically rely either on global Lipschitz bounds, which are often conservative, or on local gradient information, which provides only a first-order approximation. This paper introduces a novel geometric framework based on the least concave majorants of the growth rate functions. Our proposed concave certificate establishes a tight bound on DR risk that remains applicable to non-Lipschitz and non-differentiable losses. We extend this framework to complexity analysis, introducing the worst-case generalization bound that complements the standard statistical generalization bound. Furthermore, we utilize this certificate to bound the gap between adversarial and empirical Rademacher complexity, demonstrating that dependencies on input diameter, network width, and depth can be eliminated. For practical application in deep learning, we introduce the adversarial score as a tractable relaxation of the concave certificate that enables efficient and layer-wise analysis of neural networks. We validate our theoretical results in various numerical experiments on classification and regression tasks using real-world data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2026.

Builds on

22 of 56 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  3. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
  4. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 413
  5. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  6. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 309
  7. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
  8. 2017A General and Adaptive Robust Loss Functioncited by 236
  9. 2016Distributionally Robust Stochastic Optimization with Wasserstein Distancecited by 182
  10. 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
  11. 2020Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimizationcited by 87
  12. 2017Regularization via Mass Transportationcited by 79
10 more
  1. 2020Finite-Sample Guarantees for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Breaking the Curse of Dimensionalitycited by 49
  2. 2020Adversarial Learning Guarantees for Linear Hypotheses and Neural Networkscited by 47
  3. 2018Adversarial Risk and Robustness: General Definitions and Implications for the Uniform Distributioncited by 32
  4. 2023Wasserstein distributional robustness of neural networkscited by 15
  5. 2021A Unified Theory of Robust and Distributionally Robust Optimization via the Primal-Worst-Equals-Dual-Best Principlecited by 12
  6. 2022A Short and General Duality Proof for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 12
  7. 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustnesscited by 11
  8. 2020Sensitivity analysis of Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization problemscited by 10
  9. 2024Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization and its tractable regularization formulationscited by 5
  10. 2025Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Nonparametric Regressioncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.