mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Atomizer: An LLM-based Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Intent-Driven Commit Untangling

arXiv 2601.01233 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2026cs.SEcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Composite commits, which entangle multiple unrelated concerns, are prevalent in software development and significantly hinder program comprehension and maintenance. Existing automated untangling methods, particularly state-of-the-art graph clustering-based approaches, are fundamentally limited by two issues. (1) They over-rely on structural information, failing to grasp the crucial semantic intent behind changes, and (2) they operate as ``single-pass'' algorithms, lacking a mechanism for the critical reflection and refinement inherent in human review processes. To overcome these challenges, we introduce Atomizer, a novel collaborative multi-agent framework for composite commit untangling. To address the semantic deficit, Atomizer employs an Intent-Oriented Chain-of-Thought (IO-CoT) strategy, which prompts large language models (LLMs) to infer the intent of each code change according to both the structure and the semantic information of code. To overcome the limitations of ``single-pass'' grouping, we employ two agents to establish a grouper-reviewer collaborative refinement loop, which mirrors human review practices by iteratively refining groupings until all changes in a cluster share the same underlying semantic intent. Extensive experiments on two benchmark C# and Java datasets demonstrate that Atomizer significantly outperforms several representative baselines. On average, it surpasses the state-of-the-art graph-based methods by over 6.0% on the C# dataset and 5.5% on the Java dataset. This superiority is particularly pronounced on complex commits, where Atomizer's performance advantage widens to over 16%.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2026.

Builds on

5 of 18 references.

References · 5

  1. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
  2. 2020CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languagescited by 1,286
  3. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
  4. 2023Large Language Models are Few-Shot Summarizers: Multi-Intent Comment Generation via In-Context Learningcited by 71
  5. 2024A Pair Programming Framework for Code Generation via Multi-Plan Exploration and Feedback-Driven Refinementcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLM-Driven Collaborative Model for Untangling Commits via Explicit and Implicit Dependency Reasoning
  2. 2025AgentPack: A Dataset of Code Changes, Co-Authored by Agents and Humans
  3. 2026Learning to Commit: Generating Organic Pull Requests via Online Repository Memory
  4. 2024MaCTG: Multi-Agent Collaborative Thought Graph for Automatic Programming
  5. 2026AgentSZZ: Teaching the LLM Agent to Play Detective with Bug-Inducing Commits
  6. 2026AgenticSZZ: Temporal Knowledge Graph-Guided Agentic Bug-Inducing Commit Identification
  7. 2026Detecting Vulnerability-Inducing Commits via Multi-Stage Reasoning with LLM-Based Agents
  8. 2025LinkAnchor: An Autonomous LLM-Based Agent for Issue-to-Commit Link Recovery