CSSBench: Evaluating the Safety of Lightweight LLMs against Chinese-Specific Adversarial Patterns
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in cost-sensitive and on-device scenarios, and safety guardrails have advanced mainly in English. However, real-world Chinese malicious queries typically conceal intent via homophones, pinyin, symbol-based splitting, and other Chinese-specific patterns. These Chinese-specific adversarial patterns create the safety evaluation gap that is not well captured by existing benchmarks focused on English. This gap is particularly concerning for lightweight models, which may be more vulnerable to such specific adversarial perturbations. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Chinese-Specific Safety Benchmark (CSSBench) that emphasizes these adversarial patterns and evaluates the safety of lightweight LLMs in Chinese. Our benchmark covers six domains that are common in real Chinese scenarios, including illegal activities and compliance, privacy leakage, health and medical misinformation, fraud and hate, adult content, and public and political safety, and organizes queries into multiple task types. We evaluate a set of popular lightweight LLMs and measure over-refusal behavior to assess safety-induced performance degradation. Our results show that the Chinese-specific adversarial pattern is a critical challenge for lightweight LLMs. This benchmark offers a comprehensive evaluation of LLM safety in Chinese, assisting robust deployments in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2026.
Builds on
27 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025FORTRESS: Frontier Risk Evaluation for National Security and Public Safety17 Jun
- 2024Phi-3 Safety Post-Training: Aligning Language Models with a "Break-Fix" Cycle18 Jul
- 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preference20 Jun
- 2023Flames: Benchmarking Value Alignment of LLMs in Chinese12 Nov
Other references · 23
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
- 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
- 2023Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4cited by 290
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 251
- 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easilycited by 242
- 2022"I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Datasetcited by 160
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Small Language Models in the Era of Large Language Models: Techniques, Enhancements, Applications, Collaboration with LLMs, and Trustworthinesscited by 125
- 2024Small Language Models: Survey, Measurements, and Insightscited by 109
11 more
- 2025MiniCPM4: Ultra-Efficient LLMs on End Devicescited by 51
- 2024ToxiCloakCN: Evaluating Robustness of Offensive Language Detection in Chinese with Cloaking Perturbationscited by 30
- 2024From Languages to Geographies: Towards Evaluating Cultural Bias in Hate Speech Datasetscited by 23
- 2025Exploring Multimodal Challenges in Toxic Chinese Detection: Taxonomy, Benchmark, and Findingscited by 10
- 2025Lost in Pronunciation: Detecting Chinese Offensive Language Disguised by Phonetic Cloaking Replacementcited by 10
- 2024Chinese SafetyQA: A Safety Short-form Factuality Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2022Adversarial Text Normalizationcited by 5
- 2025Can Small Language Models Reliably Resist Jailbreak Attacks? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 3
- 2025Beyond the Tip of Efficiency: Uncovering the Submerged Threats of Jailbreak Attacks in Small Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Fine-Grained Chinese Hate Speech Understanding: Span-Level Resources, Coded Term Lexicon, and Enhanced Detection Frameworkscited by 2
- 2025Libra: Large Chinese-based Safeguard for AI Contentcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026A Comparative Evaluation of AI Agent Security Guardrailscited by 1
- 2026JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Datacited by 0
- 2026Beyond English and Evasion: A Human-Annotated Multi-Domain Benchmark for High-Stakes LLM Safety Evaluation in Chinesecited by 0
- 2026Stop Early, Spend Less: Hidden-State Probes as a Practical Recipe for Streaming Moderation of LLM Outputscited by 0
- 2026Who Judges the Judges? A Chinese Safety QA Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Responses and Safety Judgescited by 0
- 2026Who Judges the Judges? A Chinese Safety QA Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Responses and Safety Judges1 Sep 2026
- 2026Stop Early, Spend Less: Hidden-State Probes as a Practical Recipe for Streaming Moderation of LLM Outputs9 Jun 2026
- 2026Beyond English and Evasion: A Human-Annotated Multi-Domain Benchmark for High-Stakes LLM Safety Evaluation in Chinese28 May 2026
- 2026JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Data23 May 2026
- 2026A Comparative Evaluation of AI Agent Security Guardrails27 Apr 2026