Basic Inequalities for First-Order Optimization with Applications to Statistical Risk Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we introduce textitbasic inequalities for first-order iterative optimization algorithms, forming a simple yet versatile framework which connects implicit and explicit regularization. Building on related comparison inequalities for optimization iterates that already exist in the literature, we extend and unify these arguments to produce a general framework, which can be used as a tool for statistical analysis. In more detail, let f denote the objective function to be optimized. Given a first-order iterative algorithm initialized at θ0, with current iterate θT, the basic inequality upper bounds f(θT) - f(z) for any reference point z in terms of the accumulated step sizes, and the distances between θ0, θT, and z. These distances are measured in a geometry inherent to the optimization algorithm, which then translates into a notion of regularization being applied across the path of iterates. In addition to refining existing results on gradient descent, we provide new results for mirror descent and other first-order methods. We then show how to use these basic inequalities to derive elementary yet useful bounds on the prediction risk of early-stopped gradient descent and exponentiated gradient descent iterates in generalized linear models. We also supplement these findings with numerical experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2025.
Builds on
18 of 52 references.
References · 18
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 342
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 303
- 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 266
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 239
- 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 89
- 2018A Continuous-Time View of Early Stopping for Least Squarescited by 69
- 2020The Implicit Regularization of Stochastic Gradient Flow for Least Squarescited by 59
- 2020Gradient descent follows the regularization path for general lossescited by 59
- 2013Margins, Shrinkage, and Boostingcited by 35
- 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Loss: Non-Monotonicity of the Loss Improves Optimization Efficiencycited by 35
6 more
- 2021The Benefits of Implicit Regularization from SGD in Least Squares Problemscited by 32
- 2018Finite-sample analysis of M-estimators using self-concordancecited by 30
- 2017Early stopping for kernel boosting algorithms: A general analysis with localized complexitiescited by 27
- 2023A Unified Approach to Controlling Implicit Regularization via Mirror Descentcited by 14
- 2024On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regressioncited by 11
- 2025Benefits of Early Stopping in Gradient Descent for Overparameterized Logistic Regressioncited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.