mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Implicit score matching meets denoising score matching: improved rates of convergence and log-density Hessian estimation

arXiv 2512.24378 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2025math.ST cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of estimating the score function using both implicit score matching and denoising score matching. Assuming that the data distribution exhibiting a low-dimensional structure, we prove that implicit score matching is able not only to adapt to the intrinsic dimension, but also to achieve the same rates of convergence as denoising score matching in terms of the sample size. Furthermore, we demonstrate that both methods allow us to estimate log-density Hessians without the curse of dimensionality by simple differentiation. This justifies convergence of ODE-based samplers for generative diffusion models. Our approach is based on Gagliardo-Nirenberg-type inequalities relating weighted L2-norms of smooth functions and their derivatives.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022From Denoising Diffusions to Denoising Markov Models
  2. 2025Heteroscedasticity of Denoising Score Matching with Generalised Smooth Noise
  3. 2025Low-dimensional adaptation of diffusion models: Convergence in total variation
  4. 2025DDPM Score Matching and Distribution Learning
  5. 2024From optimal score matching to optimal sampling
  6. 2025A Connection Between Score Matching and Local Intrinsic Dimension
  7. 2025Optimizing Input of Denoising Score Matching is Biased Towards Higher Score Norm
  8. 2026Sobolev Regularized Score Difference Estimation in Diffusion Models