Lie to Me: Knowledge Graphs for Robust Hallucination Self-Detection in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hallucinations, the generation of apparently convincing yet false statements, remain a major barrier to the safe deployment of LLMs. Building on the strong performance of self-detection methods, we examine the use of structured knowledge representations, namely knowledge graphs, to improve hallucination self-detection. Specifically, we propose a simple yet powerful approach that enriches hallucination self-detection by (i) converting LLM responses into knowledge graphs of entities and relations, and (ii) using these graphs to estimate the likelihood that a response contains hallucinations. We evaluate the proposed approach using two widely used LLMs, GPT-4o and Gemini-2.5-Flash, across two hallucination detection datasets. To support more reliable future benchmarking, one of these datasets has been manually curated and enhanced and is released as a secondary outcome of this work. Compared to standard self-detection methods and SelfCheckGPT, a state-of-the-art approach, our method achieves up to 16% relative improvement in accuracy and 20% in F1-score. Our results show that LLMs can better analyse atomic facts when they are structured as knowledge graphs, even when initial outputs contain inaccuracies. This low-cost, model-agnostic approach paves the way toward safer and more trustworthy language models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
- 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 345
- 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 329
- 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
- 2025Why Language Models Hallucinatecited by 205
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language, Image, Video and Audio Foundation Modelscited by 98
- 2023Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Surveycited by 92
- 2024Extract, Define, Canonicalize: An LLM-based Framework for Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 70
- 2024Factuality of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 64
11 more
- 2024Building Guardrails for Large Language Modelscited by 61
- 2024On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Factscited by 43
- 2023KG-GPT: A General Framework for Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs Using Large Language Modelscited by 32
- 2024Knowledge Graphs, Large Language Models, and Hallucinations: An NLP Perspectivecited by 29
- 2025Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models with Metamorphic Relationscited by 24
- 2025Verify when Uncertain: Beyond Self-Consistency in Black Box Hallucination Detectioncited by 18
- 2024Cost-Effective Hallucination Detection for LLMscited by 16
- 2024Investigating and Addressing Hallucinations of LLMs in Tasks Involving Negationcited by 15
- 2023Self-Contradictory Reasoning Evaluation and Detectioncited by 14
- 2024FACTOID: FACtual enTailment fOr hallucInation Detectioncited by 10
- 2025Line of Duty: Evaluating LLM Self-Knowledge via Consistency in Feasibility Boundariescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.