mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved cystic hygroma detection from prenatal imaging using ultrasound-specific self-supervised representation learning

arXiv 2512.22730 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2025cs.CV cs.AI eess.IVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cystic hygroma is a high-risk prenatal ultrasound finding that portends high rates of chromosomal abnormalities, structural malformations, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Automated detection can increase reproducibility and support scalable early screening programs, but supervised deep learning methods are limited by small labelled datasets. This study assesses whether ultrasound-specific self-supervised pretraining can facilitate accurate, robust deep learning detection of cystic hygroma in first-trimester ultrasound images. We fine-tuned the Ultrasound Self-Supervised Foundation Model with Masked Autoencoding (USF-MAE), pretrained on over 370,000 unlabelled ultrasound images, for binary classification of normal controls and cystic hygroma cases used in this study. Performance was evaluated on the same curated ultrasound dataset, preprocessing pipeline, and 4-fold cross-validation protocol as for the DenseNet-169 baseline, using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). Model interpretability was analyzed qualitatively using Score-CAM visualizations. USF-MAE outperformed the DenseNet-169 baseline on all evaluation metrics. The proposed model yielded a mean accuracy of 0.96, sensitivity of 0.94, specificity of 0.98, and ROC-AUC of 0.98 compared to 0.93, 0.92, 0.94, and 0.94 for the DenseNet-169 baseline, respectively. Qualitative Score-CAM visualizations of model predictions demonstrated clinical relevance by highlighting expected regions in the fetal neck for both positive and negative cases. Paired statistical analysis using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirmed that performance improvements achieved by USF-MAE were statistically significant (p = 0.0057).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2025.

Builds on

14 of 33 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  6. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  8. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  9. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  10. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  11. 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 188
  12. 2024UltraSam: A Foundation Model for Ultrasound using Large Open-Access Segmentation Datasetscited by 23
2 more
  1. 2025USF-MAE: Ultrasound Self-Supervised Foundation Model with Masked Autoencodingcited by 16
  2. 2025Deep Learning Analysis of Prenatal Ultrasound for Identification of Ventriculomegalycited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.