Scaling Unverifiable Rewards: A Case Study on Visual Insights
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Model (LLM) agents can increasingly automate complex reasoning through Test-Time Scaling (TTS), iterative refinement guided by reward signals. However, many real-world tasks involve multi-stage pipeline whose final outcomes lack verifiable rewards or sufficient data to train robust reward models, making judge-based refinement prone to accumulate error over stages. We propose Selective TTS, a process-based refinement framework that scales inference across different stages in multi-agent pipeline, instead of repeated refinement over time by prior work. By distributing compute across stages and pruning low-quality branches early using process-specific judges, Selective TTS mitigates the judge drift and stabilizes refinement. Grounded in the data science pipeline, we build an end-to-end multi-agent pipeline for generating visually insightful charts and report of given dataset, and design a reliable LLM-based judge model, aligned with human experts (Kendall's τ=0.55). Our proposed selective TTS then improves insight quality under a fixed compute budget, increasing mean scores from 61.64 to 65.86 while reducing variance. We hope our findings serve as the first step toward to scaling complex, open-ended tasks with unverifiable rewards, such as scientific discovery and story generation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2025.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025AgentTTS: Large Language Model Agent for Test-time Compute-optimal Scaling Strategy in Complex Tasks26 Jul
- 2025Two Heads are Better Than One: Test-time Scaling of Multi-agent Collaborative Reasoning14 Apr
Other references · 14
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 763
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
- 2025Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scalingcited by 135
- 2024Fast Best-of-N Decoding via Speculative Rejectioncited by 112
- 2025HypoBench: Towards Systematic and Principled Benchmarking for Hypothesis Generationcited by 34
- 2024LEVA: Using Large Language Models to Enhance Visual Analyticscited by 24
- 2025ChartInsighter: An Approach for Mitigating Hallucination in Time-series Chart Summary Generation with A Benchmark Datasetcited by 9
- 2020What are Data Insights to Professional Visualization Users?cited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026TMAS: Scaling Test-Time Compute via Multi-Agent Synergy
- 2025Rethinking Inference-Time Scaling: Efficiency Limits and Linguistic Signals
- 2025J1: Exploring Simple Test-Time Scaling for LLM-as-a-Judge
- 2026AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifier
- 2026Scaling the Scaling Logic: Agentic Meta-Synthesis of Logic Reasoning
- 2025ReProbe: Efficient Test-Time Scaling of Multi-Step Reasoning by Probing Internal States of Large Language Models
- 2025Step-level Verifier-guided Hybrid Test-Time Scaling for Large Language Models
- 2025A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning