mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Tennis Strategy Through Curriculum-Based Dueling Double Deep Q-Networks

arXiv 2512.22186 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tennis strategy optimization is a challenging sequential decision-making problem involving hierarchical scoring, stochastic outcomes, long-horizon credit assignment, physical fatigue, and adaptation to opponent skill. I present a reinforcement learning framework that integrates a custom tennis simulation environment with a Dueling Double Deep Q-Network(DDQN) trained using curriculum learning. The environment models complete tennis scoring at the level of points, games, and sets, rally-level tactical decisions across ten discrete action categories, symmetric fatigue dynamics, and a continuous opponent skill parameter. The dueling architecture decomposes action-value estimation into state-value and advantage components, while double Q-learning reduces overestimation bias and improves training stability in this long-horizon stochastic domain. Curriculum learning progressively increases opponent difficulty from 0.40 to 0.50, enabling robust skill acquisition without the training collapse observed under fixed opponents. Across extensive evaluations, the trained agent achieves win rates between 98 and 100 percent against balanced opponents and maintains strong performance against more challenging opponents. Serve efficiency ranges from 63.0 to 67.5 percent, and return efficiency ranges from 52.8 to 57.1 percent. Ablation studies demonstrate that both the dueling architecture and curriculum learning are necessary for stable convergence, while a standard DQN baseline fails to learn effective policies. Despite strong performance, tactical analysis reveals a pronounced defensive bias, with the learned policy prioritizing error avoidance and prolonged rallies over aggressive point construction. These results highlight a limitation of win-rate driven optimization in simplified sports simulations and emphasize the importance of reward design for realistic sports reinforcement learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2025.

Builds on

4 of 14 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  2. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  3. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
  4. 2019Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environmentcited by 257

Built on by

Not cited yet.