mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leash: Adaptive Length Penalty and Reward Shaping for Efficient Large Reasoning Model

arXiv 2512.21540 ↗First posted 25 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 13

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing approaches typically rely on fixed length penalties, but such penalties are hard to tune and fail to adapt to the evolving reasoning abilities of LLMs, leading to suboptimal trade-offs between accuracy and conciseness. To address this challenge, we propose Leash (adaptive LEngth penAlty and reward SHaping), a reinforcement learning framework for efficient reasoning in LLMs. We formulate length control as a constrained optimization problem and employ a Lagrangian primal-dual method to dynamically adjust the penalty coefficient. When generations exceed the target length, the penalty is intensified; when they are shorter, it is relaxed. This adaptive mechanism guides models toward producing concise reasoning without sacrificing task performance. Experiments on Deepseek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 show that Leash reduces the average reasoning length by 60% across diverse tasks - including in-distribution mathematical reasoning and out-of-distribution domains such as coding and instruction following - while maintaining competitive performance. Our work thus presents a practical and effective paradigm for developing controllable and efficient LLMs that balance reasoning capabilities with computational budgets.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2025.

Builds on

27 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Just Enough Thinking: Efficient Reasoning with Adaptive Length Penalties Reinforcement Learning5 Jun
  2. 2025Thinking Fast and Right: Balancing Accuracy and Reasoning Length with Adaptive Rewards23 May
  3. 2025Don't Overthink it. Preferring Shorter Thinking Chains for Improved LLM Reasoning23 May
  4. 2025Learn to Reason Efficiently with Adaptive Length-based Reward Shaping21 May
  5. 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models22 Apr
  6. 2025Efficient Reasoning Models: A Survey15 Apr
  7. 2025ThinkPrune: Pruning Long Chain-of-Thought of LLMs via Reinforcement Learning2 Apr
  8. 2025Reasoning to Learn from Latent Thoughts24 Mar
  9. 2025L1: Controlling How Long A Reasoning Model Thinks With Reinforcement Learning6 Mar
  10. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  11. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec

Other references · 16

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  3. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  4. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  5. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  6. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  7. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
  8. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
  9. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
  10. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
  11. 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 567
  12. 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidancecited by 281
4 more
  1. 2025Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 262
  2. 2025Training Language Models to Reason Efficientlycited by 247
  3. 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questionscited by 97
  4. 2025Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoningcited by 75

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 13.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Fast on the Easy, Deep on the Hard: Efficient Reasoning via Powered Length Penalty
  2. 2025AALC: Large Language Model Efficient Reasoning via Adaptive Accuracy-Length Control
  3. 2026The Art of Efficient Reasoning: Data, Reward, and Optimization
  4. 2026LEAD: Length-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic Reasoning for Large Language Models
  5. 2026Stepwise Penalization for Length-Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  6. 2025LAPO: Internalizing Reasoning Efficiency via Length-Adaptive Policy Optimization
  7. 2025Not All Tokens Matter: Towards Efficient LLM Reasoning via Token Significance in Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Correct, Concise and Complete: Multi-stage Training For Adaptive Reasoning