mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Offline Safe Policy Optimization From Heterogeneous Feedback

arXiv 2512.20173 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Offline Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) learns rewards and policies aligned with human preferences without the need for extensive reward engineering and direct interaction with human annotators. However, ensuring safety remains a critical challenge across many domains and tasks. Previous works on safe RL from human feedback (RLHF) first learn reward and cost models from offline data, then use constrained RL to optimize a safe policy. While such an approach works in the contextual bandits settings (LLMs), in long horizon continuous control tasks, errors in rewards and costs accumulate, leading to impairment in performance when used with constrained RL methods. To address these challenges, (a) instead of indirectly learning policies (from rewards and costs), we introduce a framework that learns a policy directly based on pairwise preferences regarding the agent's behavior in terms of rewards, as well as binary labels indicating the safety of trajectory segments; (b) we propose textscPreSa (Preference and Safety Alignment), a method that combines preference learning module with safety alignment in a constrained optimization problem. This optimization problem is solved within a Lagrangian paradigm that directly learns reward-maximizing safe policy textitwithout explicitly learning reward and cost models, avoiding the need for constrained RL; (c) we evaluate our approach on continuous control tasks with both synthetic and real human feedback. Empirically, our method successfully learns safe policies with high rewards, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines, and offline safe RL approaches with ground-truth reward and cost.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2025.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  2. 2023Beyond Reward: Offline Preference-guided Policy Optimization25 May
  3. 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function24 May
  4. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback17 May
  5. 2022Models of human preference for learning reward functions5 Jun
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  7. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 10

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  3. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  4. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  5. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 312
  6. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learningcited by 281
  7. 2023OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 76
  8. 2022COptiDICE: Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimationcited by 69
  9. 2021Offline Preference-Based Apprenticeship Learningcited by 17
  10. 2024Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Trajectory Classificationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward Modeling
  2. 2026From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2024Latent Safety-Constrained Policy Approach for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2023Benchmarks and Algorithms for Offline Preference-Based Reward Learning
  5. 2026PREFINE: Preference-Based Implicit Reward and Cost Fine-Tuning for Safety Alignment
  6. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint
  7. 2025Online Optimization for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL