mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

γ(3,4) `Attention' in Cognitive Agents: Ontology-Free Knowledge Representations With Promise Theoretic Semantics

arXiv 2512.19084 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

The semantics and dynamics of `attention' are closely related to promise theoretic notions developed for autonomous agents and can thus easily be written down in promise framework. In this way one may establish a bridge between vectorized Machine Learning and Knowledge Graph representations without relying on language models implicitly. Our expectations for knowledge presume a degree of statistical stability, i.e. average invariance under repeated observation, or `trust' in the data. Both learning networks and knowledge graph representations can meaningfully coexist to preserve different aspects of data. While vectorized data are useful for probabilistic estimation, graphs preserve the intentionality of the source even under data fractionation. Using a Semantic Spacetime γ(3,4) graph, one avoids complex ontologies in favour of classification of features by their roles in semantic processes. The latter favours an approach to reasoning under conditions of uncertainty. Appropriate attention to causal boundary conditions may lead to orders of magnitude compression of data required for such context determination, as required in the contexts of autonomous robotics, defence deployments, and ad hoc emergency services.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.

Builds on

7 of 34 references.

References · 7

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2022A General Survey on Attention Mechanisms in Deep Learningcited by 64
  3. 2014Spacetimes with Semanticscited by 3
  4. 2024A Promise Theory Perspective on the Role of Intent in Group Dynamicscited by 2
  5. 2025Fairness in Augmented Graph Learning: A Surveycited by 2
  6. 2025Agent Semantics, Semantic Spacetime, and Graphical Reasoningcited by 2
  7. 2025On The Role of Intentionality in Knowledge Representation: Analyzing Scene Context for Cognitive Agents with a Tiny Language Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Time is Not a Label: Continuous Phase Rotation for Temporal Knowledge Graphs and Agentic Memory
  2. 2026The Observer-Situation Lattice: A Unified Formal Basis for Perspective-Aware Cognition
  3. 2026Semantic Bayesian World Models
  4. 2025Graph Distance as Surprise: Free Energy Minimization in Knowledge Graph Reasoning
  5. 2026Focus Is All You Need: Adaptive Goal-aware Attention Orchestration for Multi-Agent Graph Systems
  6. 2026Learning Dynamic Belief Graphs for Theory-of-mind Reasoning
  7. 2026Toward Effective and Reliable LLM Agents via Dynamic Ontology
  8. 2026Integrating Graphs, Large Language Models, and Agents: Reasoning and Retrieval