Localising Shortcut Learning in Pixel Space via Ordinal Scoring Correlations for Attribution Representations (OSCAR)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks often exploit shortcuts. These are spurious cues which are associated with output labels in the training data but are unrelated to task semantics. When the shortcut features are associated with sensitive attributes, shortcut learning can lead to biased model performance. Existing methods for localising and understanding shortcut learning are mostly based upon qualitative, image-level inspection and assume cues are human-visible, limiting their use in domains such as medical imaging. We introduce OSCAR (Ordinal Scoring Correlations for Attribution Representations), a model-agnostic framework for quantifying shortcut learning and localising shortcut features. OSCAR converts image-level task attribution maps into dataset-level rank profiles of image regions and compares them across three models: a balanced baseline model (BA), a test model (TS), and a sensitive attribute predictor (SA). By computing pairwise, partial, and deviation-based correlations on these rank profiles, we produce a set of quantitative metrics that characterise the degree of shortcut reliance for TS, together with a ranking of image-level regions that contribute most to it. Experiments on CelebA, CheXpert, and ADNI show that our correlations are (i) stable across seeds and partitions, (ii) sensitive to the level of association between shortcut features and output labels in the training data, and (iii) able to distinguish localised from diffuse shortcut features. As an illustration of the utility of our method, we show how worst-group performance disparities can be reduced using a simple test-time attenuation approach based on the identified shortcut regions. OSCAR provides a lightweight, pixel-space audit that yields statistical decision rules and spatial maps, enabling users to test, localise, and mitigate shortcut reliance. The code is available at https://github.com/acharaakshit/oscar
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2025.
Builds on
40 of 59 references.
References · 40
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
28 more
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 209
- 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
- 2016Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networkscited by 181
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
- 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
- 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 156
- 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 120
- 2019Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributescited by 76
- 2020Fairness by Learning Orthogonal Disentangled Representationscited by 76
- 2022Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testingcited by 52
- 2022Diagnosing failures of fairness transfer across distribution shift in real-world medical settingscited by 45
- 2022Detecting Shortcuts in Medical Images -- A Case Study in Chest X-rayscited by 20
- 2025Invisible Attributes, Visible Biases: Exploring Demographic Shortcuts in MRI-based Alzheimer's Disease Classificationcited by 2
- 2025On Measuring Localization of Shortcuts in Deep Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.