mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Generalizable Neural Operators for Inverse Problems

arXiv 2512.18120 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inverse problems challenge existing neural operator architectures because ill-posed inverse maps violate continuity, uniqueness, and stability assumptions. We introduce B2B-1, an inverse basis-to-basis neural operator framework that addresses this limitation. Our key innovation is to decouple function representation from the inverse map. We learn neural basis functions for the input and output spaces, then train inverse models that operate on the resulting coefficient space. This structure allows us to learn deterministic, invertible, and probabilistic models within a single framework, and to choose models based on the degree of ill-posedness. We evaluate our approach on six inverse PDE benchmarks, including two novel datasets, and compare against existing invertible neural operator baselines. We learn probabilistic models that capture uncertainty and input variability, and remain robust to measurement noise due to implicit denoising in the coefficient calculation. Our results show consistent re-simulation performance across varying levels of ill-posedness. By separating representation from inversion, our framework enables scalable surrogate models for inverse problems that generalize across instances, domains, and degrees of ill-posedness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.

Builds on

18 of 36 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  3. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
  4. 2021Solving Inverse Problems in Medical Imaging with Score-Based Generative Modelscited by 521
  5. 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 212
  6. 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 113
  7. 2023Neural Inverse Operators for Solving PDE Inverse Problemscited by 65
  8. 2020The troublesome kernel -- On hallucinations, no free lunches and the accuracy-stability trade-off in inverse problemscited by 40
  9. 2013A computational framework for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems. Part I: The linearized case, with application to global seismic inversioncited by 32
  10. 2022Semi-supervised Invertible Neural Operators for Bayesian Inverse Problemscited by 25
  11. 2025Neural Chaos: A Spectral Stochastic Neural Operatorcited by 21
  12. 2024Invertible Fourier Neural Operators for Tackling Both Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 19
6 more
  1. 2024Basis-to-Basis Operator Learning Using Function Encoderscited by 17
  2. 2025Function Encoders: A Principled Approach to Transfer Learning in Hilbert Spacescited by 10
  3. 2022To be or not to be stable, that is the question: understanding neural networks for inverse problemscited by 8
  4. 2025Adaptive Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 5
  5. 2022A Frequency-Velocity CNN for Developing Near-Surface 2D Vs Images from Linear-Array, Active-Source Wavefield Measurementscited by 2
  6. 2025SetONet: A Set-Based Operator Network for Solving PDEs with Variable-Input Samplingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.