A Network Arena for Benchmarking AI Agents on Network Troubleshooting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic systems, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), assist network engineers with network configuration synthesis and network troubleshooting tasks. For network troubleshooting, progress is hindered by the absence of standardized and accessible benchmarks for evaluating LLM agents in dynamic network settings at low operational effort. We present NIKA, the largest public benchmark to date for LLM-driven network incident diagnosis and troubleshooting. NIKA targets both domain experts and especially AI researchers alike, providing zero-effort replay of real-world network scenarios, and establishing well-defined agent-network interfaces for quick agent prototyping. NIKA comprises hundreds of curated network incidents, spanning five network scenarios, from data centers to ISP networks, and covers 54 representative network issues. Lastly, NIKA is modular and extensible by design, offering APIs to facilitate the integration of new network scenarios and failure cases. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLM agents on NIKA and find that while larger models succeed more often in detecting network issues, they still struggle to localize faults and identify root causes. NIKA is open-source and available to the community: https://github.com/sands-lab/nika.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026SADE: Symptom-Aware Diagnostic Escalation for LLM-Based Network Troubleshootingcited by 3
- 2026Evaluating Agentic Configuration Repair for Computer Networkscited by 1
- 2026Evidence-Grounded Ensemble Diagnosis of 802.11 Packet Captures: A Multi-Stage Pipeline with Deterministic Reliability Scoringcited by 0
- 2026Let AI Agents Translate Networks, Not Reason About Themcited by 0
- 2026CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operationscited by 0
- 2026DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflowscited by 0
- 2026FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Ticketscited by 0
- 2026Safety Signals to Verify NetOps Agents with Action-Level Granularitycited by 0
- 2026Safety Signals to Verify NetOps Agents with Action-Level Granularity13 Sep 2026
- 2026FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets27 Aug 2026
- 2026DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows27 Aug 2026
- 2026CTBench: Evaluating Troubleshooting Capabilities of AI Agents in Realistic Telecom Network Operations12 Aug 2026
- 2026Let AI Agents Translate Networks, Not Reason About Them24 Jul 2026
- 2026Evidence-Grounded Ensemble Diagnosis of 802.11 Packet Captures: A Multi-Stage Pipeline with Deterministic Reliability Scoring5 Jun 2026
- 2026Evaluating Agentic Configuration Repair for Computer Networks4 Jun 2026
- 2026SADE: Symptom-Aware Diagnostic Escalation for LLM-Based Network Troubleshooting6 May 2026