AI Needs Physics More Than Physics Needs AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence (AI) is commonly depicted as transformative. Yet, after more than a decade of hype, its measurable impact remains modest outside a few high-profile scientific and commercial successes. The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Chemistry and Physics recognized AI's potential, but broader assessments indicate the impact to date is often more promotional than technical. We argue that while current AI may influence physics, physics has significantly more to offer this generation of AI. Current architectures - large language models, reasoning models, and agentic AI - can depend on trillions of meaningless parameters, suffer from distributional bias, lack uncertainty quantification, provide no mechanistic insights, and fail to capture even elementary scientific laws. We review critiques of these limits, highlight opportunities in quantum AI and analogue computing, and lay down a roadmap for the adoption of 'Big AI': a synthesis of theory-based rigour with the flexibility of machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.
Builds on
10 of 42 references.
References · 10
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
- 2025The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexitycited by 302
- 2024Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Modelcited by 113
- 2018Differentiable Learning of Quantum Circuit Born Machinecited by 93
- 2025What Has a Foundation Model Found? Using Inductive Bias to Probe for World Modelscited by 47
- 2024Can AI weather models predict out-of-distribution gray swan tropical cyclones?cited by 26
- 2025DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT vs. Claude: A Comparative Study for Scientific Computing and Scientific Machine Learning Taskscited by 12
- 2025The wall confronting large language modelscited by 8
- 2025Quantum-Informed Machine Learning for Predicting Spatiotemporal Chaos with Practical Quantum Advantagecited by 7
- 2020When we can trust computers (and when we can't)cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Can Theoretical Physics Research Benefit from Language Agents?
- 2025Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Models
- 2025Towards autonomous quantum physics research using LLM agents with access to intelligent tools
- 2026TheoPhysEval: Assessing AI agents at autonomous theoretical physics problem solving
- 2026AI Agents, Language, Deep Learning and the Next Revolution in Science
- 2025PhysMaster: Building an Autonomous AI Physicist for Theoretical and Computational Physics Research
- 2025Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI
- 2026The Past and Future of AI Scientists