PIS: A Generalized Physical Inversion Solver for Arbitrary Sparse Observations via Set Conditioned Flow Matching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The estimation of high-dimensional physical parameters constrained by partial differential equations (PDEs) from limited and indirect measurements is a highly ill-posed problem. Traditional methods face significant accuracy and efficiency bottlenecks, particularly when observations are sparse, irregularly sampled, and constrained by real-world sensor placement. We propose the Physical Inversion Solver (PIS), a unified framework that couples Set-Conditioned Flow Matching with a Cosine-Annealed Sparsity Curriculum (CASC) to enable stable inversion from arbitrary, off-grid sensors even under minimal guidance. By leveraging straight-path transport, PIS achieves instantaneous inference (50 NFEs), offering orders-of-magnitude speedup over iterative baselines. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PIS reduces error by up to 88.7% under extreme sparsity (<1%) across subsurface characterization, wave-based characterization, and structural health monitoring, while providing robust uncertainty quantification for optimal sensor placement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.
Builds on
21 of 63 references.
References · 21
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
- 2022Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problemscited by 1,416
9 more
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 433
- 2019Attentive Neural Processescited by 283
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 170
- 2023Neural Inverse Operators for Solving PDE Inverse Problemscited by 65
- 2018InversionNet: A Real-Time and Accurate Full Waveform Inversion with CNNs and continuous CRFscited by 61
- 2023Inverse-design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion modelscited by 48
- 2014Likelihood-informed dimension reduction for nonlinear inverse problemscited by 27
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Physical-State-Guided Diffusion Sampling for Full-Waveform Inversion
- 2026Decoupled Latent Optimization of Diffusion Models for Full Waveform Inversion
- 2026Guided Flow Matching for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Sparse Observations: Algorithm and Theory
- 2026Fast and Faithful: Principled Conditional Flow Matching for Inverse Problems
- 2025RED-DiffEq: Regularization by denoising diffusion models for solving inverse PDE problems with application to full waveform inversion
- 2026Structure-aware Bayesian full waveform inversion via diffusion-regularized Stein variational gradient descent
- 2026Joint Velocity Slope Diffusion Prior for Structurally Constrained Velocity Model Building
- 2026Robust Physics-Guided Diffusion for Full-Waveform Inversion