mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DBT-DINO: Towards Foundation model based analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

arXiv 2512.13608 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models have shown promise in medical imaging but remain underexplored for three-dimensional imaging modalities. No foundation model currently exists for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), despite its use for breast cancer screening. To develop and evaluate a foundation model for DBT (DBT-DINO) across multiple clinical tasks and assess the impact of domain-specific pre-training. Self-supervised pre-training was performed using the DINOv2 methodology on over 25 million 2D slices from 487,975 DBT volumes from 27,990 patients. Three downstream tasks were evaluated: (1) breast density classification using 5,000 screening exams; (2) 5-year risk of developing breast cancer using 106,417 screening exams; and (3) lesion detection using 393 annotated volumes. For breast density classification, DBT-DINO achieved an accuracy of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76--0.81), outperforming both the MetaAI DINOv2 baseline (0.73, 95% CI: 0.70--0.76, p<.001) and DenseNet-121 (0.74, 95% CI: 0.71--0.76, p<.001). For 5-year breast cancer risk prediction, DBT-DINO achieved an AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76--0.80) compared to DINOv2's 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74--0.78, p=.57). For lesion detection, DINOv2 achieved a higher average sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60--0.74) compared to DBT-DINO with 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53--0.71, p=.60). DBT-DINO demonstrated better performance on cancerous lesions specifically with a detection rate of 78.8% compared to Dinov2's 77.3%. Using a dataset of unprecedented size, we developed DBT-DINO, the first foundation model for DBT. DBT-DINO demonstrated strong performance on breast density classification and cancer risk prediction. However, domain-specific pre-training showed variable benefits on the detection task, with ImageNet baseline outperforming DBT-DINO on general lesion detection, indicating that localized detection tasks require further methodological development.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.

Builds on

8 of 31 references.

References · 8

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  2. 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 724
  3. 2022MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcarecited by 448
  4. 2024Exploring scalable medical image encoders beyond text supervisioncited by 132
  5. 2025Vision Foundation Models for Computed Tomographycited by 47
  6. 2023Evaluating General Purpose Vision Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis: An Experimental Study of DINOv2 on Radiology Benchmarkscited by 33
  7. 2020Detection of masses and architectural distortions in digital breast tomosynthesis: a publicly available dataset of 5,060 patients and a deep learning modelcited by 17
  8. 2021Highdicom: A Python library for standardized encoding of image annotations and machine learning model outputs in pathology and radiologycited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.