From Zipf's Law to Neural Scaling through Heaps' Law and Hilberg's Hypothesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We inspect the deductive connection between the neural scaling law and Zipf's law -- two statements discussed in machine learning and quantitative linguistics. The neural scaling law describes how the cross entropy rate of a foundation model -- such as a large language model -- changes with respect to the amount of training tokens, parameters, and compute. By contrast, Zipf's law posits that the distribution of tokens exhibits a power law tail. Whereas similar claims have been made in more specific settings, we show that the neural scaling law is a consequence of Zipf's law under certain broad assumptions that we reveal systematically. The derivation steps are as follows: We derive Heaps' law on the vocabulary growth from Zipf's law, Hilberg's hypothesis on the entropy scaling from Heaps' law, and the neural scaling from Hilberg's hypothesis. We illustrate these inference steps by a toy example of the Santa Fe process that satisfies all four statistical laws.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.
Builds on
34 of 118 references.
References · 34
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
22 more
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 137
- 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 130
- 2024Scaling Laws with Vocabulary: Larger Models Deserve Larger Vocabulariescited by 113
- 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 101
- 2022More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations Generalizecited by 87
- 2017A Random Matrix Approach to Neural Networkscited by 80
- 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 79
- 2025How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Modelscited by 50
- 2024Reconciling Kaplan and Chinchilla Scaling Lawscited by 36
- 2023Scaling Laws for Associative Memoriescited by 30
- 2025Superposition Yields Robust Neural Scalingcited by 30
- 2025Understanding LLM Behaviors via Compression: Data Generation, Knowledge Acquisition and Scaling Lawscited by 15
- 2025AI Agents as Universal Task Solverscited by 9
- 2020Heaps' law and Heaps functions in tagged texts: Evidences of their linguistic relevancecited by 8
- 2024AlphaZero Neural Scaling and Zipf's Law: a Tale of Board Games and Power Lawscited by 7
- 2014Text mixing shapes the anatomy of rank-frequency distributions: A modern Zipfian mechanics for natural languagecited by 6
- 2018Taylor's law for Human Linguistic Sequencescited by 5
- 2024Linguistic Structure from a Bottleneck on Sequential Information Processingcited by 5
- 2018Types, Tokens, and Hapaxes: A New Heap's Lawcited by 4
- 2023Corrections of Zipf's and Heaps' Laws Derived from Hapax Rate Modelscited by 3
- 2023Heaps' Law in GPT-Neo Large Language Model Emulated Corporacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.